- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to DevOps as per OwenX's suggestion, per ATD. Daniel ( talk) 17:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is not a notable concept or idea. There is no substantial coverage of this in reliable independent sources. As far as I can tell, this term is solely used by a consulting company to advertise its services. Thenightaway ( talk) 18:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 18:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOT. The purpose of this article appears to be disseminate ideas/thoughts rather than to have properly sourced encyclopedic contents. It shouldn't have been split, but condensed down. Graywalls ( talk) 19:24, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Merge with DevOps: usage in IBM literature is not enough to establish independent notability, but is enough to ensure the term and key claims are verifiable, and sufficient for a one-paragraph section in the target article. Owen× ☎ 19:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.