The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Malcolmxl5 (
talk) 21:20, 14 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Article about a non notable Brazilian professor (It does not seem to meet
WP:PROF). The article was also deleted from
Wikipedia in Portuguese,
Wikipedia in Japanese and
Wikipedia in Italian. The sources are either self published (Lattes is a self published currriculum) or have conflict with the professor (and some of them are offline). Nothing indicates notability.
Bilhauano (
talk) 19:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete. His specialty (ancient law) appears to be a low-citation subject, but even so I can't find any of his publications that has more than low single-digit citations in Google scholar. That's not enough for
WP:PROF#C1 and I don't see anything else. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 19:53, 7 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best as this seems questionable for the applicable notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 06:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete per reasons above. Most online sources are self-published or very brief.
giso6150 (
talk) 21:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.