The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:24, 6 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:25, 13 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete I take the opposite view of DGG above. I believe that as topics, the parks are notable and therefore those articles should remain. Whereas this company is not notable in its own right so it should be deleted. If there are guidelines that suggest the opposite I'll change my mind.
HighKing++ 12:45, 14 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete I'm inclined to agree with HighKing as to notability, on INHERITED grounds.
Nosebagbear (
talk) 11:56, 20 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.