![]() | This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current main page. |
The result of the debate was create.
The template {{
UK-philatelist-stub}} has existed since January 2103 and is used in
50-100 articles. I propose a category
Category:British philatelist stubs, to take these people out of
Category:British people stubs where they currently have to sit.
Pam
D 09:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose the following two categories, both of which have passed the article threshold:
Dawynn ( talk) 12:01, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
1.
I just created categories for
Italian painter, 14th century birth stubs
and
Italian painter, 20th century birth stubs
The Italian painters stub category has over 800 entries and creating subcategories may increase the speed of improvement. I say this meets either
S1 - the creation of a category for which an approved upmerged template already exists and is now in use on more than 60 articles. S2 - the creation of an upmerged national-level template for a subject in which other such national-level templates currently exist
Rococo1700 ( talk) 16:22, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
I think we should have a way to categorize "Disappearance of" type articles, since they are not appropriate for {{
bio-stub}}
. The code I have worked up is:
Extended content
| |
---|---|
{{Asbox | image = | pix = 30 | subject = | qualifier = about a missing person | category = Missing people stubs | tempsort = | note = <!-- For use on "Disappearance of" articles --> | name = Template:Missing-bio-stub }}
|
The reason I brought this here is that I can't find a suitable Icon to use. Something with two people, (like File:Crystal Clear app Login Manager.svg) involving a question mark, maybe? File:At a loss.svg is the only one even close.-- Auric talk 14:09, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
The
Category:Novel stubs cat is very well diffused, but not the
Category:Story stubs and
Category:Short story collection stubs. I'm willing to help diffuse these cats. I suggest starting with centuries: 19thC-story-stub, 20thC-story-stub, 21stC-story-stub and their corresponding collection cats 19thC-story-collection-stub, 20thC-story-collection-stub, and 21stC-story-collection-stub. We can later add decade stubs as we see fit. Thanks,
Aristophanes68
(talk) 23:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was do not create.
Most of the entries in
Category:Play stubs are plays whose dates are not readily available. But most of the ancient and medieval play-stub articles do have dates listed, but they have no category to sort into because we have no cats for anything before the 15th century--see
Category:Pre-18th-century play stubs for the available options. There aren't a lot of these articles, but it seems odd to have no other place to put them, given how many other time-based play-stub cats we do have. Therefore I propose we create an "early-play-stub" template that would cover all the pre-12thC play stubs and that would be placed in the pre-18th-century category. Thanks,
Aristophanes68
(talk) 21:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create upmerged templates for now.
Under the S2 criteria, I propose creating Category:1900s play stubs (35 articles), Category:1910s play stubs (37 articles), Category:1940s play stubs (50 articles), Category:1950s play stubs (58 articles), and Category:2010s play stubs (53 articles). I believe that the decade-categorization is sufficiently established that it should not matter how many stubs are in these categories and that filling in the missing decades is more important. Also, I half-created the 2010s play stub cat before I realized that they needed to be requested here; it's still up, but not listed in any stub cats yet. Sorry! Aristophanes68 (talk) 02:59, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating
Category:Southwestern Indiana stubs - a quick scan finds
161 stubs.
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu 20:50, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Northern Indiana geography stubs is at 500 stubs. I propose splitting it according to
Northern Indiana#Sub-regions:
These regions don't quite cover all of North Indiana; they leave 57 stubs behind. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:11, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
I propose creating
Category:Cook County, Illinois geography stubs - in adition to
Category:Chicago, Illinois geography stubs (almost at 60 right now - and while a bit of Chicago is in DuPage County, nearly the whole city is in Cook County), this should catch an other
21 stubs tagged with {{
CookCountyIL-geo-stub}}.
עוד מישהו
Od Mishehu 13:17, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Category:Indiana geography stubs's subcat system is curremntly messed up. I thinkk we need to fix it in the following way:
With the exception of the categories mentioned above, no other categories should be created until the stubs at Category:Indiana geography stubs are mostly sorted, when it's possible to see what needs to be done. What do other users think about this? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:47, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose initial splits for
Category:Lamiinae stubs
Dawynn ( talk) 11:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
The result of the debate was create.
Propose new templates and categories for both the Heteropsini and Hexoplonini tribes. Each of these already have one genus with a full category, with other genera that can help fill the tribal categories:
Dawynn ( talk) 11:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)