Toolbox |
---|
Prior A-class review: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Armed Forces of Liberia/archive1
I am nominating this article for A-Class review because much has been incorporated and changed based on the recommendations of the previous A-Class review, and I'd like to see whether it's ready for A-class. Buckshot06( prof) 06:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Prose needs work.
Here are random points at the top, which suggest an independent copy-edit is due. The prose is not too bad, but now would be a good time to spruce it.
Tiny tiny images. The default size will be boosted from 180 to 220 in a few days' time, but even so, I'd force to 240 or 250.
It's not hugely below Class-A standard, but does need a lift. Tony (talk) 12:50, 17 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Oppose Still badly structured. The history section starts with one large unstructured amount of information that hardly explains the purpose of the Liberian forces for suppressing the natives and does not mention how they handled uprisings and how frequent that was. You must totally rework the structure. If you want a history section make it a short summary with larger subsections.
Lots of non-essential information like listing non-noteable commanders. Compare this to US Army. They don't list every general there.
There are too many quotes that could be reworded make part of the text. Wandalstouring ( talk) 14:50, 18 October 2009 (UTC) reply