This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Mauritius. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
Adding a new AfD discussion
Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Mauritius|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
Other types of discussions
You can also add and remove other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Mauritius. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.
Further information
For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to
Africa.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
Before you jump the gun and delete it which appears to be your specislisation, I suggest you give this plant the time to grow and for it to be properly documented. Thank you.
Stockbroker369 (
talk) 12:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
This is not a food, drink place LOL. This is a famous Domaine in Mauritius, close to Mahebourg.
Stockbroker369 (
talk) 11:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
We'd maybe look at CORP notability.
Oaktree b (
talk) 12:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: The sources identified by Rosguill in the last AfD seem to be enough to keep the article (I'm not listing them here, they can be seen by clicking on the prior AfD in the box at the right). That editor's analysis is fine.
Oaktree b (
talk) 12:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I would accept draftification as an
WP:ATD since appropriate references have not been added since the previous AFD. -
UtherSRG(talk) 12:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
UtherSRG, how about you add the sources yourself instead?
Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a game of Mother, May I? Articles do not need to get sent back to the beginning just because someone didn't follow the directions perfectly. It would probably take you less time to copy and paste those sources over than has already been spent in this AFD.
There isn't actually a requirement in any policy or guideline to cite sources. Our rule is that a subject can qualify for a separate article if
sources exist in the real world, even if none are cited in the article. As a long-term project, if you want to be able to delete or hide articles because they don't contain at least one source, then I suggest that you propose that. There was some effort to extended
WP:BLPPROD rules to all articles earlier this year. The consensus went the other way, but perhaps if you read that discussion, you'd be able to find a path forward towards your goal.
WhatamIdoing (
talk) 18:22, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the suggestion, but I see no reason to change my course. Good day. -
UtherSRG(talk) 19:00, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
StarMississippi 01:42, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep:
Stockbroker369 This is an interesting article. It would be to your advantage if you could add a couple of more inline sources. Preferably in the first two paragraphs. Also images need to have the description on them like I just added.
— Maile (
talk) 03:15, 12 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: It is possible that this is heading toward a consensus to keep the article. Please comment on the sources raised in the previous AFD and whether the subject meets the
general notability guidelines or
WP:NCORP. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (
talk) 01:54, 19 June 2024 (UTC)reply