This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Health and fitness. It is one of many
deletion lists coordinated by
WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.
- Adding a new AfD discussion
- Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at
WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at
WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:
-
Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
- You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Health and fitness|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
- Note that there are a few
scripts and tools that can make this easier.
- Removing a closed AfD discussion
- Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by
a bot.
- Other types of discussions
- You can also add and remove links to other discussions (
prod,
CfD,
TfD etc.) related to Health and fitness.
- Further information
- For further information see Wikipedia's
deletion policy and
WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.
Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:
See also:
Medicine-related deletions and
Disability-related deletions
Please be sure to follow the
three basic steps when nominating an article for deletion. While not required, it is courteous to also
notify interested people—such as those who created the article, or those who have contributed significant work to it. Thank you.
-
Tushy (company) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
So as I mentioned on my
AfD for their CEO, here I am. There were... quite the volume of
WP:PRODUCTREV to get through, but nothing with significant coverage of the company, and barely anything on any specific product. Though this was not the primary focus, I do not believe any individual product of theirs is notable either, even ignoring questions of ORGIND or RS. The coverage of their events would seem to be excluded on
WP:SPIP. I don't see any plausible way to meet
WP:NCORP here.
Alpha3031 (
t •
c) 10:50, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2024 (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
With all due respect to the page creator, I think it's evident by now that it's past the time for the "
Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic" series to end. Case numbers from Malaysia and New Zealand every few days, two arbitrary case counts from other countries, a couple thresholds and anniversaries, and links to WHO situation reports, do not a notable or encyclopedic topic make. All of the "countries and territories" with no infections have zero permanent population anyway. This topic doesn't meet
WP:NOTDATABASE or
WP:NLIST; there is not enough worldwide noteworthy content out there to justify the existence of such a timeline nowadays, as opposed to the early pandemic.
Due to the decline of testing, case numbers are not accurate anymore anyway. "The actual number of cases is likely to be much higher than the number of confirmed cases – this is due to limited testing." -
Our World in Data. Experts from WHO and elsewhere asked by
Time are uncertain it even is a pandemic anymore, with some outright saying it is not; there will never be an official cutoff for an exact end date of the pandemic since WHO does not officially classify pandemics (also noted in Time and
elsewhere). And because COVID-19
is expected to circulate indefinitely and become an endemic respiratory virus, this series must end at some point even though case numbers continue to be reported (as they are for seasonal flu, which we don't track on Wikipedia). I believe that time is here, as evidenced by what the series has shrunk into.
Crossroads
-talk- 21:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Health and fitness,
COVID-19,
Medicine, and
Lists.
Crossroads
-talk- 21:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect to
Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2023 and rename to
Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic since 2023. Agree with nom, week-by-week case numbers in individual countries are simply not what should be included in a global article like this. I want to give props to the editors here, but great folks have also been keeping
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/Malaysia medical cases chart and
Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/New Zealand medical cases chart updated for
COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia and
COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand so putting this data in prose form is not necessary. I then recommend trimming the target article and previous monthly articles of routine country-specific data updates and only including significant news (which does not include random singers and athletes contracting it).
Reywas92
Talk 22:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Agree with the nom; this isn't as important as it once was. We know have moved on, the world is open again, and Covid is more of an annoyance than a pandemic... We need to stop this series of yearly/monthly articles at some point and 2024 seems to be a logical place to stop.
Oaktree b (
talk) 01:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Not so notable for now.
Orientls (
talk) 07:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Having worked on that page as well as the
New Zealand and
Malaysian pages, I agree that it will probably be best for me to stop working on the global timeline page. I am glad someone raised this topic since I need someone to tell me when to stop. Will accept any decision taken by the Wikipedia community.
Andykatib 08:30, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Danialle Karmanos (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Routine coverage and awards; no reliable sources. Likely not meeting ANYBIO
BoraVoro (
talk) 12:33, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep: Some coverage of her philanthropy
[1],
[2],
[3]. Sources 2 and 3 I've listed are more about a yoga program she founded, perhaps create the article and redirect there or to the Children's Hospital in Detroit?
Oaktree b (
talk) 12:58, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
deletion sorting lists for the following topics:
Businesspeople,
Women,
Journalism,
Health and fitness,
Education, and
Michigan.
WCQuidditch
☎
✎ 19:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Sorry, but the sources and article don't look notable in my eyes.
Wolverine XI (
talk to me) 14:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Victoria Starmer (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
I'm not seeing evidence that the subject is independently notable of her husband, Keir Starmer. The existing article can be adequately summarised at his article. Still, we might expect more coverage if Starmer becomes Prime Minister, so it may be a question of
WP:TOOSOON. Consequently, I would be content with Draftify as an
alternative to deletion, assuming more sources may become available within six months that nudge the subject past the notability threshold.
IgnatiusofLondon (he/him •
☎️) 08:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- At least, hopefully this AfD can resolve the notability tag currently on the article.
IgnatiusofLondon (he/him •
☎️) 08:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- @
IgnatiusofLondon, hey there. As creator of the article, I have no objection to draftifying it. I found as much as I could on the subject while keeping in mind that it is highly likely we will get more information in a couple of weeks.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 09:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- While understandable, the issue is that this exercise, completed too early, leads to trivia-collecting articles that violate policy. For example, the article contains the name of her sister, which likely fails
WP:BLPNAME. There's no reason for her sister to be named if there is no independent notability.
There is no deadline.
IgnatiusofLondon (he/him •
☎️) 09:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Redirect to
Keir Starmer. This is the only way I can think of given there's no way for making this article notable.
Galaxybeing (
talk) 10:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
- @
Galaxybeing, for now at least. Hence why it should be draftified.
Omnis Scientia (
talk) 16:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Dozy Mmobuosi Foundation (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Not meeting GNG; Promo; delete or redirect to Dozy Mmobuosi or
BoraVoro (
talk) 11:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
reply
-
Wellbeing Literacy (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views) – (
View AfD |
edits since nomination)
- (Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL)
Promotional and created by an SPA account.
Insufficient sourcing independent of
Lindsay Oades, a few other scholarly articles exist but none appear substantial enough to re-write this article.
Walsh90210 (
talk) 23:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
reply