The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 19:14, 10 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Not a template. This appears to be article content, but it has not been used anywhere. Delete; copy/paste into the appropriate article first, if needed. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 13:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Template has been used in the intended articles. Templates bring the benefit that errors are corrected in all related articles instead of having mismatching content across different pages.
RM12 (
talk) 07:13, 4 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete and LST per Pppery.
SWinxy (
talk) 19:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per above --
Lenticel(
talk) 00:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 14:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)reply
KeepTemplate:Lesotho coups and
Template:São Toméan coups (four entries); delete remainder (three entries). My personal threshold of utility is a bit lower than the
WP:NENAN essay: I don't think two "See also" links is too many for a well-defined topic, but when there are three I start wondering why there isn't just a navbox about it. This is just an opinion, though, without firm policy basis.
Folly Mox (
talk) 21:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)reply
One of the Sao Tomé and Principe links is a redlink. –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 02:32, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete all. All of the coups (except for {{Qatari coups}}) are already linked in their respective countries' topics template (e.g. {{Fiji topics}}). Extra navboxes are unnecessary.
SWinxy (
talk) 19:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 19:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak delete per nom. (Weak because I don't know the topic area.)
SWinxy (
talk) 19:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom --
Lenticel(
talk) 00:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Izno (
talk) 19:13, 10 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak delete per nom. (Weak because I don't know the topic area.)
SWinxy (
talk) 19:10, 8 September 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom --
Lenticel(
talk) 00:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.