The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Template:Mo Farah ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only one link outside the title link directly related to the subject. Just the rest are general links to records and sporting events. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Delete, not a useful navigation template. This is used on one article, Mo Farah which already includes a listing of his medals and a series of navboxes for the various events he competed in. 192.76.8.84 ( talk) 18:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete, seems to duplicate other navboxes on that page CRwikiCA  talk 18:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. Jay D. Easy ( t) 20:55, 26 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Template:United States nuke plant map ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused map. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 17:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC) reply

It's not unused? -- Trialpears ( talk) 21:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC) reply

It was just added today. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:13, 15 March 2023 (UTC) reply

I often wonder if people creating these maps also look at them. How is anything on the eastern side even readable? Gonnym ( talk) 18:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC) reply

I think this template would be much more usable if it was based around kartographer rather than location maps, at least that way you would be able to zoom in to see individual locations. 192.76.8.84 ( talk) 18:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:53, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• weak keep, I reformatted it to use template:maplink and now it's usable/interactive. Frietjes ( talk) 20:21, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Template:Alphabet nan kilil ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template with a bunch of red links connecting to articles in Southern Min. No apparent use for this. Was copied out from User:Cuaxdon/Alphabet nan kiril. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 04:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Template:2000 Currie Cup Section Y Log ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to what's available at 2000_Currie_Cup_qualification#Section_Y. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 04:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• delete, already merged with attribution, so no longer needed. Frietjes ( talk) 15:48, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 20:03, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:03, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Template:2000 Currie Cup Section X Log ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Redundant to what's available at 2000_Currie_Cup_qualification#Section_X. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 04:39, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• delete, already merged with attribution, so no longer needed. Minorax, the same is probably true for the rest of Category:South Africa rugby union standings templates. Frietjes ( talk) 15:49, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete Per nom. Rugbyfan22 ( talk) 20:04, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Template:Editnotices/Page/Bakugan: Mechtanium Surge ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Editnotices/Page/Castle Town Dandelion ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Editnotices/Page/Chaos Dragon ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Editnotices/Page/Danchigai ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Editnotices/Page/Gate (novel series) ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Editnotices/Page/List of Witchy PreCure! episodes ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Editnotices/Page/My Wife Is the Student Council President ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Editnotices/Page/Rampo Kitan: Game of Laplace ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:Editnotices/Page/Wakaba Girl ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The Template:Future episodes editnotice reminds users about strict sourcing requirements for future episodes of currently airing TV series and seasons. Except for List of Doctor Who episodes (2005–present), all of the articles with this editnotice are for TV series and episodes which have concluded airing. Tagging these editnotice instances will require template editor intervention. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 01:25, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Delete Per nom. IMO deleting obsolete/unneeded edit notices would probably fall under WP:G6 as uncontroversial maintenance. 192.76.8.84 ( talk) 18:16, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nomination. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 23:59, 24 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• Template:Roger Ebert's Best Film of the Year ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not an award navbox instead it's a listing of the noted critic Roger Ebert list of best films for each year from 1967 to 2012. The same list is on his article. I've added the best film of the decade to Ebert's article. WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 00:10, 23 March 2023 (UTC) reply

• delete, better to link to the article in the prose instead of using a navbox to avoid navbox creep. Frietjes ( talk) 15:40, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. The films are only tangentially related to one another. -- wooden superman 11:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).