- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:53, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Another Neelix-specific template. No reason to autofill a delete rationale with a repealed CSD criterion.
House
Blaster
talk 23:32, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 21:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 21:40, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 21:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
No links and better served already by
Template:South Ayrshire.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 21:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 21:12, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused. If a place for use is found then subst on there.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 21:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- delete seems redundant to
2022 FIFA World_Cup#Stadiums. if more statistics are useful, then they can be merged there, but seems like
WP:NOTSTATS to me.
Frietjes (
talk) 02:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
* Pppery *
it has begun... 23:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 15:54, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 13:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
Template about a wikiproject that doesn't exist in English Wikipedia. Used in only one article in 2014, unlikely to be of further use. Can be subst'ed as text or replaced with {{
WikiProject Italy}}.
ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (
talk) 12:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Partofthemachine (
talk) 20:18, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗
plicit 13:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
A sports team roster from 2010 that was used on one page, for the team. I just removed that as it's clearly not being kept active, and now serves no purpose.
Kaiser matias (
talk) 07:22, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- delete, out of date. if there were a 2010 season article, I could see merging it there, but there isn't.
Frietjes (
talk) 02:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2023 January 8.
✗
plicit 13:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).