From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

May 19

Template:Bfidb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Missed this one when I nominated the others here and here. The template is unused and the template has been marked as superseded by Template:BFI. Gonnym ( talk) 23:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:8TeamBracketReSeedsBronze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC) reply

redundant to {{8TeamBracket|RD1-RD2-path=0}}, {{ 8TeamBracket}} with 2/1/1 legs, and {{ 8TeamBracket}} plus {{ 4TeamBracket}}. Frietjes ( talk) 15:53, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Delete all per nomination. Same as the other sports bracket templates nominated. Unused and redundant. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 16:18, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Gender unclear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 May 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BWF World Superseries Champions: Top Five Indonesian Badminton Players – Men's Doubles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:01, 27 May 2021 (UTC) reply

The template {Top ten badminton players} is already there to mention the top ranked players in badminton. This template is unnecessary. 🌌Zoglophie🌌 08:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Delete all per nomination. Unused and redundant. -- WikiCleanerMan ( talk) 15:45, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pornography sidebar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G3 by RickinBaltimore ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

A 'template' that isn't even a template and full of promotional content. No transclusions whatsoever and presumably created for pure disruption. Johnnyconnorabc ( talk) 01:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply

  • Nominated for speedy deletion; pure vandalism – Aidan721 ( talk) 02:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).