February 3
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:51, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 20:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:51, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 20:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:50, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 20:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:50, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 20:31, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 20:32, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 17:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Now has zero transclusions as I've added a more detailed table to the article.
Number
5
7 12:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:48, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
No transclusions. Similar information as displayed in this template is currently in
2002–03 Lithuanian presidential election. Delete as unnecessary and no foreseeable use other than the aforementioned article.
Steel1943 (
talk) 22:51, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Agree to delete. Not sure why I created this in the first place, it's almost 11 years old now...
nneonneo
talk 23:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 17:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete' Substitution not necessary as there is already an equally detailed (and better formatted) table in the article. Not sure why the "Substitute and delete" !votes above have been made, unless the editors in question haven't read the nomination in full...
Number
5
7 12:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 22:49, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 17:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Now has zero transclusions as I've added a better formatted table (with the correct percentages) to the article.
Number
5
7 12:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 22:48, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 17:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Now has zero transclusions as I've added a more detailed table to the article.
Number
5
7 12:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:50, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
One transclusion. Substitute and delete.
Steel1943 (
talk) 22:35, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete Per nom.
Nigej (
talk) 17:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Substitute and delete per nom. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete I've replaced it with a better table which has the correct results (the ones in this table appear to be the preliminary ones).
Number
5
7 12:54, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 23:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
"Country data" templates that have no country and no images. Kind of defeats the purpose, no? As a note, these templates cannot use a "flag" image because these flags (aside from FIFA) are non-free and thus cannot be placed in templates like this.
Primefac (
talk) 17:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 19:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
Apart from the programme itself, the only links present are to current presenters and - as per
WP:PERFNAV - these type of links should not appear in navboxes for programmes etc.
Jellyman (
talk) 13:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Per nom. The main presenters are in the infobox on the main page, the most common link needed.
Nigej (
talk) 16:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. No need for a navbox. --
Tom (LT) (
talk) 07:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2019 February 10.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 23:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2019 February 10.
(non-admin closure)
Zackmann (
Talk to me/
What I been doing) 23:29, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).