From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 26

Template:Districts of the Metropolitan Association of Upper Silesia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 15:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC) reply

This template is only transcluded onto Metropolitan Association of Upper Silesia and nowhere else. ToThAc ( talk) 18:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete - per nom. Template has sat dormant for almost 10 years. -- Gokunks ( Speak to me) 02:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment Keep - Wouldn't it be better to put the template on each of those pages in order to aid in navigation? It doesn't make sense to delete something when it is not being used enough but has the chance to be (unless I am missing something about its relevance to the topic). Nihlus 00:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 06:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 14:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ARPrelim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Winged Blades Godric 15:48, 5 February 2018 (UTC) reply

unused; at first I thought this was unused because it is being substituted, but the instructions specifically say that it should not be substituted. Frietjes ( talk) 15:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Merge I don't know a huge amount about Arbcom, but I'm guessing the frequency is low and the template is removed quickly. The template is referenced at Wikipedia:Abuse response/Guide to abuse response. I'd suggest a merger into Template:ARA Bellezzasolo  Discuss 16:25, 16 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Note The ArbCom clerks have been notified, but I did not want to relist this discussion until tomorrow due to the high number of templates currently listed on today's TFD list. Primefac ( talk) 15:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Merge As an ArbCom clerk, I find this useful. Mini apolis 00:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply
{{ARA|prelim}} doesn't seem much different than ARPrelim, so what about a merger? (certainly shouldn't be deleted though) Galobtter ( pingó mió) 08:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Pinging Miniapolis just in case they don't see this reply/relist. Primefac ( talk) 14:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac ( talk) 14:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Yes, a merge is a better idea. Mini apolis 15:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC) "Prelim" is not a valid parameter for {{ ARA}} and I have yet to see this template used by my fellow ArbCom clerks, so delete. Mini apolis 14:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rough Guide 2002

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:02, 3 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Along with:

All red links. Unused. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 07:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).