The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Delete - per nom. Template has sat dormant for almost 10 years. --
Gokunks (
Speak to me) 02:27, 12 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Comment Keep - Wouldn't it be better to put the template on each of those pages in order to aid in navigation? It doesn't make sense to delete something when it is not being used enough but has the chance to be (unless I am missing something about its relevance to the topic).
Nihlus 00:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Winged BladesGodric 06:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Primefac (
talk) 14:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
unused; at first I thought this was unused because it is being substituted, but the instructions specifically say that it should not be substituted.
Frietjes (
talk) 15:52, 16 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Note The ArbCom clerks have been notified, but I did not want to relist this discussion until tomorrow due to the high number of templates currently listed on today's TFD list.
Primefac (
talk) 15:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Merge As an ArbCom clerk, I find this useful.
Miniapolis 00:21, 26 January 2018 (UTC)reply
{{ARA|prelim}} doesn't seem much different than ARPrelim, so what about a merger? (certainly shouldn't be deleted though)
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 08:32, 26 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Pinging
Miniapolis just in case they don't see this reply/relist.
Primefac (
talk) 14:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Primefac (
talk) 14:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)reply
Yes, a merge is a better idea.
Miniapolis 15:00, 26 January 2018 (UTC) "Prelim" is not a valid parameter for {{ARA}} and I have yet to see this template used by my fellow ArbCom clerks, so delete.
Miniapolis 14:14, 3 February 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).