December 30
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 08:11, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
reply
As far as I can tell, this template is redundant to
Template:Test case.
{{3x|p}}ery (
talk) 21:39, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Delete.
Template:Test case is a bit more multifunctional, but it does perform this template's function. If there's no strong opposition on the basis that this template is preferable in some circumstances, I think deletion is appropriate. --
Bsherr (
talk) 05:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2019 January 7.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 07:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 07:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
reply
No remaining transclusions; replaced by {{
Adjacent stations}} and
Module:Adjacent stations/Taoyuan Metro.
Jc86035 (
talk) 14:59, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to
Template:Fb overview.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 07:34, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
reply
Propose merging
Template:Fb overview2 with
Template:Fb overview.
Have the same purpose and even though
Template:Fb overview doesn't include start/end date/round, it can easily be adjusted to do the same without prejudicing the pages already using it.
A.Caseiro (
talk) 20:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose - Even though I like your idea, I think that there is no need for this merging to be done. Having two different templates can give editors more options depends on how they want to use the templates.
Ben5218 (
talk) 12:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
reply
- merge, seems trivial to omit the fm, lm, sr, fp columns if those parameters are omitted.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:08, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 09:00, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
reply
- Merge. The way this will be implemented, having only one template will still give editors the option to omit those columns, correct? --
Bsherr (
talk) 05:35, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Merge. Overview2 is just overview with more options, which we can choose to include or not. They are very similar, so this merge is natural to me.
Centaur271188 (
talk) 03:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).