June 3
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
Team is not currently active so no need for this roster
Spanneraol (
talk) 21:12, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
WP:NENAN
Laun
chba
ller 10:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- delete, links three articles. can be linked through the see also section if needed.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
Jc86035 (
talk) Use {{
re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 07:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2017 June 11.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2017 June 11.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2017 June 11.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
Jc86035 (
talk) Use {{
re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 07:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
Jc86035 (
talk) Use {{
re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 07:08, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
Unused.
Jc86035 (
talk) Use {{
re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 07:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
Only used in one article. Could be replaced with {{
Tone}}.
Jc86035 (
talk) Use {{
re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 07:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on
2017 June 11.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was withdrawn due to the lack of interest here, I will look for a different venue if necessary.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:24, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
To be clear, I don't want to have this template deleted, but I do want to discuss it's usage. current, I count
around 450 transclusions of a template with (fortunately) only 8 links. per
WP:BIDIRECTIONAL, this is not a good idea. of course, we aren't going to create a template with all ca. 1800 award recipients, which is why we have a category. I am proposing to remove this template from all articles except for those which are linked within the navbox. since this forum is for discussing templates, I thought this was as good as any place to have the discussion. for precedent see
the discussion for Template:Lists of Russians.
Frietjes (
talk) 19:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:03, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge to
Template:GMA Anchors and feel free to nominate them for deletion
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 19:31, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
Propose merging
Template:GoodMorningAmericaAnchors with
Template:GMA Anchors.
Both templates carry the same header, in slightly different form, and each contains some information that the other does not contain. The information within both navboxes should be combined under a single umbrella.
—Roman Spinner
(talk)(contribs) 22:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:55, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).