October 31
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete ~
Rob13
Talk 02:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
This band only has 1 album with an article. Perhaps a navbox will be warranted at a later time but for right now it is unnecessary. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me 22:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Well, then what about Bands having only one album out and also use a Discography template? Like
Template:Sound_of_Contact, for example? --
Razalduria (
talk) 10:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- It's not a discography template, it's a navigation box. The purpose is for ease of navigation not to present a band's discography. If I come across others, I would nominate them. I'm not looking for them. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
Talk to me 17:19, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- delete, provides very little useful navigation.
Frietjes (
talk) 22:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 02:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
Template not in current use.
Farolif (
talk) 21:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
-
Farolif, looks like it's used in
Labour Party (UK).
Frietjes (
talk) 21:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- It was transcluded within
Template:HOLtotal....give it a few more minutes for the history to clear....
Farolif (
talk) 21:08, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- There, it's gone now.
Farolif (
talk) 21:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 02:47, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused subtemplate
Frietjes (
talk) 20:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete.
WP:REFUND applies. ~
Rob13
Talk 02:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete.
WP:REFUND applies. ~
Rob13
Talk 02:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete.
WP:REFUND applies. ~
Rob13
Talk 02:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was soft delete.
WP:REFUND applies. ~
Rob13
Talk 02:39, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:28, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates
Template:Administrative divisions of Azerbaijan
Frietjes (
talk) 20:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and generally duplicates navigation provided by
Template:Local councils of Malta and Gozo
Frietjes (
talk) 20:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- There are about
40 articles it could be used on. –
Uanfala (
talk) 23:25, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: unused and redundant to a filled in {{
cite book}}, which has additional parameters for things such as page number. --
HyperGaruda (
talk) 10:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete – there are too few articles (
6 at present) it could be used on, and the citation is otherwise straightforward to format without a specific source template. –
Uanfala (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 23:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: unused and redundant to a filled in {{
cite book}}, which has additional parameters for things such as page number. --
HyperGaruda (
talk) 10:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: unused and redundant to a filled in {{
cite book}}, which has additional parameters for things such as page number. --
HyperGaruda (
talk) 10:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:23, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete – no readily apparent wide scope for use (only
2 articles cite this text at present) and the citation is otherwise simple enough to be easily formatable without this specific template. –
Uanfala (
talk) 23:33, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: unused and redundant to a filled in {{
cite book}}, which has additional parameters for things such as page number. --
HyperGaruda (
talk) 10:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as
G7 by
RHaworth (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 02:04, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- I'm fine with it being deleted, but please keep its image. Thanks,
cmɢʟee⎆
τaʟκ 01:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and all redlinks
Frietjes (
talk) 20:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates timeline found in
Cinderella_(band)#Band_members
Frietjes (
talk) 20:20, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates infobox found in
Church of Satan
Frietjes (
talk) 20:19, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Not YET used. So do not remove it.
WeiaR (
talk) 21:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- You've had six years to use it.
Ppp
ery 00:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:16, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates functionality provided by
Template:WikiProject Christianity/class
Frietjes (
talk) 20:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused subtemplate of a redirect
Frietjes (
talk) 20:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 20:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and not clear where it would be used
Frietjes (
talk) 20:10, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and not in English
Frietjes (
talk) 20:03, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, could be merged with an article?
Frietjes (
talk) 20:02, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and not clear where this would be used
Frietjes (
talk) 20:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates navigation provided by other navigational boxes
Frietjes (
talk) 20:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and slightly out-of-date. the problem with putting the roster in a template like this is that it's typically not substituted when the competition is over, causing the wrong roster to appear in older articles. it's better to just put the roster directly in the article.
Frietjes (
talk) 20:00, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and not needed per
WP:NOT
Frietjes (
talk) 19:55, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:23, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and generally duplicates
Template:Television in Hungary
Frietjes (
talk) 19:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was moved to userspace
(non-admin closure)
Frietjes (
talk) 21:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 19:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 19:48, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
all red links
Frietjes (
talk) 19:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 19:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 18:58, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and not a good use of a navbox. better to use categories and list articles for this type of navigation.
Frietjes (
talk) 18:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, not a good use of a navbox, better to use categories and list articles.
Frietjes (
talk) 18:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates
Template:Pennsylvania State Senators
Frietjes (
talk) 18:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates content in the parent article
Frietjes (
talk) 18:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and out-of-date
Frietjes (
talk) 18:52, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and out-of-date
Frietjes (
talk) 18:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and not needed
Frietjes (
talk) 18:51, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 18:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:17, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 18:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, and if it were used, it should be replaced by a simple citation template
Frietjes (
talk) 18:46, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and out-of-date
Frietjes (
talk) 18:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete The second team of Litex Lovech is not competing in any higher league anymore, see also
PFC Litex Lovech II.
Kq-hit (
talk) 19:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and out-of-date (non-notable historic squad)
Frietjes (
talk) 18:45, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete This particular squad does not have any notable relevance.
Kq-hit (
talk) 19:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 18:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused infobox template
Frietjes (
talk) 18:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and out-of-date
Frietjes (
talk) 18:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
useless now that the image has been deleted
Frietjes (
talk) 17:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and out-of-date
Frietjes (
talk) 17:37, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Plays in a non-notable league and the main article
Sparta Rotterdam (Mutual) FC does not include a current squad that would indicate that a significant amount of notable players would be present.
Kq-hit (
talk) 19:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 17:32, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and almost entirely redlinks
Frietjes (
talk) 17:29, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:15, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and generally duplicates {{
infobox school}}
Frietjes (
talk) 17:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and out-of-date
Frietjes (
talk) 17:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and there is consensus for deleting actor sidebar templates since standard in-article linking connects the subarticles.
Frietjes (
talk) 17:24, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused, out-of-date, and broken
Frietjes (
talk) 17:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:16, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates other ship infobox templates
Frietjes (
talk) 17:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and almost all red links
Frietjes (
talk) 17:18, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused
Frietjes (
talk) 17:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
duplicate of
Template:Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA)
Frietjes (
talk) 17:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates list found in
Megadiverse countries
Frietjes (
talk) 17:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
unused and duplicates navigation found in
Template:Mega Man series
Frietjes (
talk) 17:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:12, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
old and unused
Frietjes (
talk) 17:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 01:11, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
Unused, incoherent.
Rob Sinden (
talk) 13:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- delete, no clear inclusion criteria.
Frietjes (
talk) 15:43, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Award ceremony hosts
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on
2016 November 7 ~
Rob13
Talk 02:38, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).