October 23
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was withdrawn
(non-admin closure)
Frietjes (
talk) 15:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
no parent article. if needed for a wikiproject, can be housed in project space.
Frietjes (
talk) 22:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete ~
Rob13
Talk 02:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
content should be moved to a proper section in the parent article, rather than hiding it in a navbox at the foot of the article.
Frietjes (
talk) 22:23, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
old and unused.
Frietjes (
talk) 22:10, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on
2016 October 30 ~
Rob13
Talk 02:15, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was redirect.
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 23:09, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
This template does nothing.
Jbh
Talk 19:45, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as
G2 by
78.26 (
talk ·
contribs ·
blocks ·
protections ·
deletions ·
page moves ·
rights ·
RfA)
AnomieBOT
⚡ 03:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
Malformed & contains non-English text; unclear how it would be used.
: Noyster
(talk), 12:42, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The result of the discussion was merge as discussed. ~
Rob13
Talk 02:16, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
Confusing. Contains only one subsection of called acid types and
Template:Acids and bases also contains a subsection of called acid types, but with different content.
The information contained in both places should be merged together into one template.
Comfr (
talk) 18:12, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
I have added the section, "Number of hydrogen ions," to the
Template:Acids and bases, so it now contains all of the information in
Template:Acids.
Comfr (
talk) 02:59, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Merge not as confusion but as superfluous to that template.
Debresser (
talk) 19:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review).