The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete, a "right to left" option has been added to {{ pull quote}}. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:27, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:Centered pull rtl quote ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes ( talk) 15:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Keep: Used it where it was originally intended. --— ШαмıQ ✍ @ 11:35, 21 November 2016 (UTC) reply
  • User:Wamiq, I updated that article for you to use |rtl=y. Frietjes ( talk) 13:59, 22 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:28, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:Cebu City-produced news programs ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes ( talk) 15:39, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:Cerrad Czarni Radom team - 2014-2015 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused, 9th place squad Frietjes ( talk) 15:38, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:Cetartiodactyla Cladogram and classification ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes ( talk) 15:35, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:Cgi process ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused Frietjes ( talk) 15:34, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:Chadar Sub Clans ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and duplicates Template:Rajput Groups Frietjes ( talk) 15:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:ChavezElections1998 ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and duplicates Template:Venezuelan presidential election, 1998 Frietjes ( talk) 15:31, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:Champaign-Urbana ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and duplicates navigation found in Template:Champaign County, Illinois Frietjes ( talk) 15:30, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:29, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:Changsha Ginde Squad ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and out-of-date Frietjes ( talk) 15:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 03:32, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:Johannesburg 2006 regions ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

appears the contents is incomplete (compare with Template:City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality). could be replaced by just the image and still show the regions. Frietjes ( talk) 15:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:1894 college football independents records ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:1894 college football records ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:1894 college football independents records with Template:1894 college football records.
New template doesn't conform with existing naming convention, as seen at Category:NCAA Division I FBS independents football records templates. UW Dawgs ( talk) 02:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Merge to Template:1894 college football independents records. Jweiss11 ( talk) 00:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:40, 24 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Template:1895 college football independents records ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
• Template:1895 college football records ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:1895 college football independents records with Template:1895 college football records.
New template doesn't conform with existing naming convention, as seen at Category:NCAA Division I FBS independents football records templates. UW Dawgs ( talk) 02:05, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

UW Dawgs, are you suggesting that the target should be the older Template:1895 college football records? As discussed previously, there's a problem with the naming of the templates you recently created, namely that "independent" is missing from their titles. Prior to 1892, "Template:YYYY college football records" seems fine. But starting in 1892 we have conference standings templates, so "independent" is necessary. Jweiss11 ( talk) 04:58, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Again, per Category:NCAA Division I FBS independents football records templates, these two do not conform to the current naming structure of that era. Let's correct them as they are wrong. If you care to propose larger project and new naming convention, you're welcome to do so (or be just bold). Fixing these doesn't depend on resolving an overdue discussion on years and naming conventions. UW Dawgs ( talk) 05:40, 15 November 2016 (UTC) reply

I have renamed all of these templates from 1892 to included the word "independent". Jweiss11 ( talk) 00:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

• Merge to Template:1895 college football independents records. Jweiss11 ( talk) 00:15, 16 November 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).