The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Redundant to {{Infobox monarchy}}, two which the |last_monarch=} and |ended= parameters, and any necessary logic relating to |incumbent=, should be added. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing);
Talk to Andy;
Andy's edits 12:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)reply
merge, although shouldn't {{Infobox monarchy}} be tagged if we are proposing changing that template?
Frietjes (
talk) 22:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
merge, and I have now merged the syntax, so the former can be redirected to the current and everything will still work.
Frietjes (
talk) 22:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Merge - Chaos will unfold once teams start folding. ZappaOMati 03:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Merge - No reason for two boxes here when one will work just fine. -
The BushrangerOne ping only 08:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge then delete •
Sbmeirow •
Talk • 05:24, 6 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Planet has been shown not to exist.
StringTheory11 (
t •
c) 00:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete or expand — A nonexistent planet may have a navbox to help document the time when it was thought to exist and how it was found to not exist. Like it is, though, this navbox barely navigates anything. —PC-XT+ 02:11, 3 April 2014 (UTC) (I am inclined to say delete with the possibility of recreation at a later time, if needed.) —PC-XT+ 02:16, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - unnecessary at present, as one of the two articles represented in the navbox is now a redirect pointing to the other one.
77.56.99.23 (
talk) 09:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.