October 14
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:05, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:"Big Four" UK banks (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
unused.
198.102.153.2 (
talk) 21:16, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:55, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:EditionPoints (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
single use template, which could be merged with the prose in the corresponding section. In the thread concerning this template
here, I do not see strong consensus for its use. If we need it, we can just substitute the template (without all the collapsible junk).
Frietjes (
talk) 21:06, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As there were no comments on this, it seems that this is an uncontroversial deletion, and so now let's finally put this template to bed.
SchuminWeb (
Talk) 17:32, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Deletedpage (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
This template was used on pages that had been deleted and should not be recreated; it was superceded by the present creation protection prior to September 2007. In September 2007 a
previous TfD closed with the outcome to replace the template with a protected redirect to
Wikipedia:Protected titles. That redirect was nominated for deletion last month at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 September 6#Template:Deletedpage. During the discussion the redirect was boldly converted back to a template, although subsequent discussion neither reflected this nor came to a consensus, although some comments there are relevant here too. As it is no longer a redirect but a template I've brought the discussion here rather than relisting it at RfD. The landscape has changed since September 2007, and creation protection is a mature system now so I think it worthwhile to reexamine the previous TfD rather than simply defer to it. This nomination should be seen as procedural only, and while I do have an opinion I am not going to express it unless others would be happy it would not be inapropriate given my closure of the RfD.
Thryduulf (
talk) 11:27, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
SchuminWeb (
Talk) 17:33, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Uw-tweak (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
A "humor" template which is only very mildly humorous, and could easily be mistaken for a serious warning. I'm not against humor; I just fail to see the benefit of non-funny humor. (I can't get exact phrase searching to work at the moment, for some reason, so I can't tell you if it has ever been used.) —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 11:15, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 23:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Uw-hangonnocsd (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Hangon templates are no longer used. Not needed. —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 11:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:—/meta/shortname (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Unused; not needed. (On another note, what system uses these "/meta/shortname" templates? They are mostly not subpages, despite the naming pattern.) —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 10:55, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- delete this one. The "foo/meta/shortname" templates are used by templates like {{
party name with colour}}.
Frietjes (
talk) 15:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Why does that template not use a naming scheme like "Template:Party shortname/....."? That would make much more sense. —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 23:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Probably because this meta data is used by more than one template. however, I don't know why this meta data isn't a subpage of the article. some historical reason I'm sure.
Frietjes (
talk) 16:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Delete completely unused and unusable
Curb Chain (
talk) 00:42, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
SchuminWeb (
Talk) 17:36, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Ethnic groups in Vojvodina (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Declined db-reason, with rationale:
- see
Template:Ethnic groups in Serbia
While this is a procedural nomination, I agree that it is a duplicate and should be replaced with that other template. —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 10:49, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: Compared to a "Template:Ethnic groups in Bavaria"->Ethnic groups in Germany. Duplicate data.--
Zoupan (
talk) 19:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete
Plastikspork
―Œ(talk) 00:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Xoomworks limited (
talk ·
history ·
transclusions ·
logs ·
subpages)
Not notable; not useful; promotional; unused. —
This, that, and
the other (talk) 10:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- Comment The main article
Xoomworks has been speedily deleted twice. The creator is a
WP:SPA and has a
WP:COI. This is an attempt at promotion and spam using a different venue. Note I am not !voting.
Curb Chain (
talk) 00:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.