From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 20

Template:AF party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Template:AF party ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Once used an image within it, which was however removed for being non-free, making it useless like this to have a template for. Unused, replaceable with simplest wiki syntax. The Evil IP address ( talk) 18:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BSG character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Template:BSG character ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No encyclopedic value over and above {{ infobox character}}. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 10:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Agree. And if you'll nominate Template:Alias character, let me know. Debresser ( talk) 07:23, 25 June 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Delete—If it weren't still in use, it would be eligible under CSD T3. Imzadi  1979  04:13, 26 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:World Wrestling Entertainment Divas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Template:World Wrestling Entertainment Divas ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Template:World Wrestling Entertainment employees. It's doing pretty much the same job as the original Template:World Wrestling Entertainment employees, just with less information. ♥ NiciVampireHeart♥ 09:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Yin Yang Yo!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Template:Yin Yang Yo! ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with only a link to the main article and two more articles. Not everything needs a navbox. LoЯd ۞pεth 03:54, 20 June 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, does not justify a navbox. Axem Titanium ( talk) 13:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Delete—I assume the grouped articles already have wikilinks to each other, making this template redundant. Imzadi  1979  04:16, 26 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:American Dragon: Jake Long

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Template:American Dragon: Jake Long ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with only a link to the main article, two more articles and a redirect. Not everything needs a navbox. LoЯd ۞pεth 03:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Delete, does not justify a navbox. Axem Titanium ( talk) 13:37, 22 June 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Delete per nom. -- AussieLegend ( talk) 19:29, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Delete—I assume the grouped articles already have wikilinks to each other, making this template redundant. Imzadi  1979  04:17, 26 June 2010 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dave the Barbarian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. T. Canens ( talk) 16:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Template:Dave the Barbarian ( talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template with only a link to the main article. The rest are two redirects to the main article and a red link. LoЯd ۞pεth 03:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.