November 28
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deletion.
RyanGerbil10
(Говорить!) 03:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Colour-box disambig (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Disambiguation pages are only for listing ambiguous possibilities, not for free-association.
WP:MOSDAB#The "See also" section lists what sort of things should go in a disambiguation's See-also section, and this doesn't fit the letter or spirit of any of them. —
76.16.92.56 (
talk) 21:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - as per nom and it is pointless
MrKIA11 (
talk) 22:34, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - "pointless" is putting it mildly. --
Russ
(talk) 23:49, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as -why? just why?
SkierRMH (
talk) 00:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, per nom. Cheers.
Hydrogen Iodide
(HI!) 20:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deletion.
RyanGerbil10
(Говорить!) 03:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Doom-monster (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Unused, as Doom monsters aren't notable, per
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of enemies in Doom.
Pagra
shtak 21:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete.
mikeshk 09:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Infobox czech village (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
No longer used on Czech settlement articles (Template:Geobox is used instead)
mikeshk (
talk) 19:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. It is better to use a standardized infobox like Geobox instead of ones like Infobox czech village. —
MJCdetroit (
talk) 20:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deletion.
RyanGerbil10
(Говорить!) 04:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:Infobox City PT (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete. Underdeveloped and only used on few pages. It has been standardized to Infobox Settlement. The talk page, doc page and redirects should also be deleted. —
MJCdetroit (
talk) 17:10, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was userfied.
RyanGerbil10
(Говорить!) 04:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:User Krypto: The Superdog (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Uses non-free image for template use in user space.
WebHamster 04:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Obviously, the outcome should be to remove the image but keep the template.
Shalom (
Hello •
Peace) 13:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Keep but delete the image as copyvio. –
Pee
Jay 14:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Migrate to userspace, remove non-free image.
Charon
X/
talk 16:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was to keep.
RyanGerbil10
(Говорить!) 04:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Template:University of Virginia (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Little to no progress has been made with the list of things wrong that Gene Nygaard pointed out on the talk page. The template is huge and almost entirely worthless and non-notable, and the one article that he mentions that 70-odd links and only one not from this template now has 500 links from the template. —
204.111.165.239 (
talk) 01:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Strong Keep A major university, and most of the articles are significant. I am however not happy about including the organisations in which the university is a member, but I'll suggest that as an editing question. Most universities have such a template, or ought to. The problems haven't been worked on, but that doesn't mean they can't be.
DGG (
talk) 07:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Keep and cleanup. WP is better off with it than without it.
Shalom (
Hello •
Peace) 13:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Strong Keep May need clean-up, but definitely not worthy of deletion. Just because a template is large does not mean it is unnecessary.
Jazznutuva (
talk) 10:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Strong Keep!
Uris 06:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Strong Keep and clean up When I saw this, I figured whom ever put this here was either a militant Virginia Tech fan, or just crazy.
Jsonitsac 16:47, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Keep Poor editing isn't a reason for deletion, its a reason to improve today, or tomorrow, or next year.
Mbisanz 09:24, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.