Liam7 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Imogen4 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Waylander.one (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
HectorTroy (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Chris
16:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Hoverfish
16:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
There is very stong evidence that
User:Liam7 has recently created 3 sockpuppets for the purpose of voting on the
Talk:Meher Baba page, beginning with two under the heading "Call for a Vote on Townshend Issue" and adding a third one further down the page on a second vote initiated by Liam7 without prior discussion.
Imogen4 and Waylander.one appear to be sockpuppets created on December 2, 2006 for the purpose of voting. See [1] [2]. HectorTroy appears to have been added on December 3 for the vote further down the page. [3]
The IP address of Liam7 is 203.26.122.12. See User talk:203.26.122.12. This is known because Liam7 accidentally referred to his own remarks on the Talk:Meher Baba page under the 203.26.122.12 address without signing in, and then appears to have concocted a story to cover it up. [4] The user 203.26.122.12, or someone using that IP can be found in the history of its talk page removing warnings about vandalism and harrassment. [5] So all of the complaints of abuse are not immediately represented on the page.
Liam7 appears to have created exotic personalities for two of the apparent sockpuppets. I quote here from Talk:Meher Baba.
More evidence that User:Liam7 is the source of these suspected sockpuppets is that Liam7 removed the original suspicion of sockpuppetry warning templates on December 4, 2006 from both Imogen4 and Waylander.one user pages almost immediately after they were placed. See [6] [7].
Chris 15:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I would also like to add that there may be a second, private computer involved, as the suspected puppet "Imogen4" wrote about "Liam7": You will see my computer is about 7 kms from his place.
[8]
[9] In my opinion Liam7 felt cornered and went to a public computer (Southern Systems, SA Government) and made up the rest from there. The past edits of IP 203.26.122.12 do not seem connected to Liam7, in style or in topic of interest. Also if Liam7 had experience of all these previous edits, he would have known better.
Hoverfish
16:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
On December 5, 2006 Liam7 added a note to Talk:Meher Baba that his actual IP is 203.221.55.142. To see the history of that IP go here: [10] Chris 14:46, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. The Ip of Liam7 is not the one quoted above 203.26.122.12. It is 203.221.55.142. See discussion page re note to Chris. It is also well known, because I have made it so, that Imogen4's computer, when used without signing on, comes up with 203.26.122.12. Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. This number 203.221.55.142. is not generated from a public computer. These computers (Southern Systems, SA Government) are not public. Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. Australian slang is used commonly in ....duh...Australia. This is not evidence. Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. The little marks -- appear on these computers when the 'signature with timestamp' is clicked. It may be an anomoly where you are from but watch this, -- Liam7 03:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC) I just clicked the 'signature with timestamp'. The computers at (Southern Systems, SA Government) where Waylander and Imogen work do the same. reply
Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. I removed the sockpuppet signs as they were slurs on these people. OK now that I know policy they will remove thme in the correct time. I will not also edit any of their stuff, even though they said OK. Watch the new history. they will edit from different computers to mine, using their mnames. Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. Someone above wrote. 'Liam7 appears to have created exotic personalities for two of the apparent sockpuppets.' Oh for pitys sake, is your life so unexotic. The web can self perpetuate rubbish by referencing other sites spouting the same rubbish. Show me real evidence, not Nah Nah na na na fluff. Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. Hector.Troy ??? never meet him! Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. Hooverfish says 'Also if Liam7 had experience of all these previous edits, he would have known better. Hoverfish' Ahhh hello theres another way to view this, Liam wasnt there. Imogen didnt log on. There was an old user with history ON THAT computer. Hooverfish why dont you cross reference Chris on this one and thereby make it a fact. Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. Whole conversations put in as fact. What for? Evidence of slang? Is that a crime too? Imogens from Norway originally, she dosnt do slang too well. Thats obvious. This proves nothing. Busted. Falsehood rebuked in above evidence. Above it is written 'There is very stong evidence that User:Liam7 has recently created 3 sockpuppets for the purpose of voting on the...' Exactly where is this evidence?? Show me the evidence Liam7 03:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Additional material.
This is from the discussion apge.
Did you notice you have -- before your name? Watch out Hooverfish knows this means you are a sockpuppet Liam7 07:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Case proven. The 3 accused sock puppet accounts are clearly single purpose accounts made to participate in the straw poll - they have made no contributions to any other subject. If by chance they are from different actual human beings recruited by Liam7, then they're the definitive case of meat puppets, and in something as unambiguous as this, arbcom has ruled we can treat them similarly. In any case, they're accounts created for the single purpose of disruption of a straw poll. Blocking all 3. -- AnonEMouse (squeak) 04:36, 29 January 2007 (UTC) reply