LakeOswego (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
74.128.181.67 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
65.89.98.17 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
216.126.104.68 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
189.164.156.182 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Ourmangwynn (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Epictatus (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Cvsvideo (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Dicktater (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Duanecwilson (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Mcws (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Jamesclark830 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Rosco999 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Jimveda (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
FeelFreeToBe (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Wildad (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Girardjl (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Saucy tin1331 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Since the opening of the
deletion review, here's a few more:
Truth9898 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Upsidedownpiano (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
Theonome (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
— Scien tizzle 02:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Lake Oswego (a pretty new account) and a cadre of WP:SPAs (4 IPs & 10 new accounts) all voted keep on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Edward Griffin (2nd nomination). Others continually recreated G. Edward Griffin following the AfD closure (now salted). Lake Oswego recreated Edward Griffin, too (now also salted). The situation resulted in an AN thread permalink & an ANI thread permalink. Lake Oswego recreated the article in userspace as well, now in the deleted revisions of User:LakeOswego. LakeOswego seems intent on making a big deal about this (not user page edits and such). — Scien tizzle 02:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The IPs have different WHOIS results, so this may be the work of just a lot of off-wiki canvass meatpuppeting, but it's maybe worth a closer look. Checkuser? — Scien tizzle 02:24, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LakeOswego now open. — Scien tizzle 03:47, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
STOP this checkuser request immediately! According to WP:RFCU "Vote fraud where the possible sockpuppet votes do not affect the outcome of the vote" is an "unacceptable request". The users accused of suckpuppetry voted "keep", but the outcome was "delete". Honor the guidelines! I am NOT a suckpuppet and can well speak for myself. Soon I will include a response to the accusation of suckpuppetry and provide a likely explanation for the "evidence" in a post on Nihonjoe's Talk page. If, however, I find that the checkuser request has been conducted, I WILL get a new username for further contributions to wikipedia, because I cannot trust anymore that my privacy is secured. Do you really have to be online 24 hours a day just to prevent people on wikipedia from running amok? FeelFreeToBe ( talk) 03:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Is This A Joke? What kind of response could I possibly have? I am not a sock puppet, nor do I have an alternative account. However, I can't prove a negative. I've been a user here for two years. I'm not someone's robot. I have never communicated with anyone else on this ridiculous list. I came to the page to look for leads to other works by G. Edward Griffin that I was not aware. I found that the page was up for deletion so, I voted to "keep" because I have found the page valuable in the past. That makes me a sockpuppet? Is my vote to keep what is claimed to be evidence justifying this slanderous accusation? It's about to make me an ex-WP user. I demand an apology and that my name be removed from this list immediately. Dicktater ( talk) 05:58, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply
This is
User:LakeOswego, Is it a joke, Are they really clamming that all these users are me? Each IP is form different country!, (74.128.181.67, 65.89.98.17, 216.126.104.68, 189.164.156.182) so just think about it, if I am really capable to do this, You think I will let someone delete the Article
G. Edward Griffin? Just use your common sense—Preceding
unsigned comment added by
LakeOswego (
talk •
contribs)
User:Calton, What is your problem with me? Do you hate me?—Preceding unsigned comment added by LakeOswego ( talk • contribs)
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/LakeOswego came back
Inconclusive. An editor came forward to explain that there had been canvassing, an obvious
sock violation. However, the article is deleted, the deletion review is closed, and the
single purpose accounts don't seem to be causing further trouble. Essentially, problem solved, no need for further action.
Jehochman
Talk 23:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
reply