HarveyCarter (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
London18 (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
BillRodgers (
talk ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
page moves ·
block user ·
block log)
-- Xiahou 01:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC) reply
[ [1]] edit by JohnRobertsly a confirmed sockpupper of HarveyCarter was removed and later the exact same edit was made by London18 [ [2]] it was removed then put right back by another later confirmed sockpuppet of his Rogersleigh.
as far as I can see starting here [ [3]] is when London18 which is actually looking like one of his first sock accounts started in on calling Jimmy Stewart a racist. Which just a couple edits later after it was reverted was put back in the same by another later confirmed sockpuppet Rogersleigh [ [4]]
[ [5]] this entire section in the Jimmy Stewart talk page is is populated by negative comments all by Gibsonism, Granville1 (both confirmed socks of HarveyCarter) taking up the conversation for one. Now BillRodgers joins the act saying the same things.
on the Steve McQueen talk page BillRodgers takes over and is the only one to comment on susupected sockpuppet London18 comment [ [6]] and Here [ [7]]
Also BillRodgers doesn't break the HarveyCarter character and hits his usual targets like Elvis [ [8]] making that comment as BillRodgers and plenty of similar comments by confirmed sockpuppets like [ [9]] [ [10]]
This is the 4th such case I have brought against HarveyCarter. I am reporting the London18 account as it slipped through the cracks when reporting all the other sock accounts of his earlier back. He hasn't used it since April but its unblocked. As his contributions show [ [11]] they are all similar downright the same of other confirmed HarveyCarter sockpuppets of that time and now.
BillRodgers is just another account in the same mold as ALL the others before it. [ [12]] As you can see from the diffs I showed plus plenty of others in his contributions compared to known HarveyCarter socks its obvious this is just another attempt at avoiding blocking. Can something be done to stop this?
The new accounts follow the same editing pattern as the old accounts. I've blocked them both. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 06:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC) reply