The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
I feel that the current name doesn't quite reflect what the category is actually for. It should encompass articles on the sociological side of sexuality, not just the sex act(s) it/themself. It would also be a more appropriate name given some of the subcats - LGBT and BDSM (hm - is that a dom/subcat? :) The permcat parent is
Cat:Sexuality, the option of just making this
Cat:Sexuality stubs would also make some sense.
Grutness...wha? 21:54, 29 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Rename to "Sexuality stubs" to match parent category. Sex is included in sexuality. --
Alynna (
talk) 20:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Rename and Redirect to "Sexuality stubs" per above. --
MISTER ALCOHOLTC20:58, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.