SheryOfficial ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

08 June 2024

– A checkuser has completed a check on relevant users in this case, and it is now awaiting administration and close.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Sharekizek ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Page moves, subject area, some beans which make me 100% sure it's them (e-mail me to discuss these if needed). Thanks, ☿  Apaugasma ( talk  ☉) 14:42, 8 June 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Primefac: behaviorally the account LolingTom also clearly is SheryOfficial, per the usual page moves, subject areas and beans I'm willing to discuss via e-mail with any admin or clerk. ☿  Apaugasma ( talk  ☉) 17:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• LolingTom's global lock is as a sock of Xpërt100, which is tagged here on enwiki as a confirmed sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub. So some sort of merging seems to be needed. SilverLocust  💬 07:26, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  I could be mistaken, but I don't think that Xpërt100 is SheryOfficial. I'm more inclined to think that the identification of LolingTom as Xpërt100 on Simple English Wikipedia is wrong. In any case I don't think it's a good idea to go for a merge without some more digging. Whether it's actually worth digging into, I'm not sure. The only thing that I can say I'm 100% of is that LolingTom is SheryOfficial. ☿  Apaugasma ( talk  ☉) 14:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• I ran a check, and oddly enough they are  Confirmed to globally-locked LolingTom but I'm not seeing any direct connection to this master. Primefac ( talk) 16:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC) reply

15 June 2024

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

• ProudRafidi ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

All the usual: focus on page moves, subject areas, and beans I'm willing to discuss with any clerk or admin via e-mail. I'm 100% certain it's them. Thanks, ☿  Apaugasma ( talk  ☉) 19:58, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Yup, this is SheryOfficial, eg [1] [2]. Please rollback all their edits. -- HistoryofIran ( talk) 20:07, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

They just admitted to socking [3]. HistoryofIran ( talk) 21:22, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Also confirmed to User:LolingTom! And to User:Sharekizek. Primefac, I'm not sure how to tag these and I'm wondering if perhaps you can have a look to see if the four ranges (three are already blocked) are candidates for a hard block, esp. considering that last comment of theirs, linked above. Drmies ( talk) 22:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC) reply

  In my opinion they've hit the LTA status of not bothering to tag them, but I do agree a rangeblock is likely on the cards here. Primefac ( talk) 15:34, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply