From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


MarquinhosWikipediano

MarquinhosWikipediano ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

01 September 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

189.35.35.204 ( talk · contribs · WHOIS) This Piracicaba, Brazil IP has publicly stated that he is the author of the draft Battle of Montese, meaning he is MarquinhosWikipediano. All the other more recent IPs I listed have the same geolocation.

  • On July 26, one of the IPs claimed that TheTimesAreAChanging is doing "possible vandalism". On the same day, a troll account called TheTimesARENTchanginglol posted on Talk:Soviet war crimes.
  • Newest registered account PastaEditor2 also calls edits that are not vandalism "possible vandalism" in edit summaries: [1] PastaEditor2 is focused on adding specific population transfer chapters to the Soviet war crimes article. Some of the IPs did exactly that, as you can see him list the chapters in this edit summary: [2]
  • MarquinhosWikipediano had a very troll-ish writing style and didn't bother to capitalize sentences etc: [3] Same can be said for PastaEditor2: [4]
  • The self-admitted Marquinhos IP had interaction with Jack90s15 sock Driverofknowledge: [5]. PastaEditor2 has interaction with Jack90s15's newer sock "I was a water boy": [6]

-- Pudeo ( talk) 20:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply

  • @ GeneralNotability: IP uses edit summary with the misspelling "gramatic": [7]. So does PastaEditor2: [8] IP wanted to add content about the deportation of ethnic groups as Soviet war crimes: [9] So did PastaEditor2, albeit different groups [10]. IP wants to add content about the Red Terror: [11]; PastaEditor2 is reverting to the IP's additions: [12] PastaEditor2 posted on Nick-D's talkpage without previous interaction: [13] One of the IP's has posted on his talkpage too: [14]. Plus the "possible vandalism" edit summary used mentioned in my filing. -- Pudeo ( talk) 20:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The CU result makes sense. There seems to be even more recent evidence connecting the IPs and PastaEditor2. Yesterday, 187.39.132.210 added content to List of wars involving Brazil, and PastaEditor2 modified and expanded the new content just 10 minutes later, suggesting he logged in. While there is the conundrum that IPs are not connected to sockmasters in SPIs, he doesn't seem to mind exposing his IP. Given this and the admission by the IP that he is the author of an article created by MalucoWikipededista, I suggest this is closed under this sockmaster and maybe the latest IP also needs blocking @ GeneralNotability:. -- Pudeo ( talk) 19:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Additional information needed Pudeo, I need some further clarification - you've linked the 189 IP to MarquinhosWikipediano and PastaEditor/TheTimesArentChanging to the IPs you listed under "suspected sockpuppets", but I don't see solid evidence linking those two groups. I agree that all of these IPs are on the same ISP and geo to the same place, but that isn't on its own going to prove things. "Trollish writing" isn't especially unique behavior, and as for both having interactions with Jack90s15 socks...true, but that would require MarquinhosWikipediano to know they were socks in order to be behavioral proof. GeneralNotability ( talk) 20:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - thanks Pudeo, moving to endorsed. Past sock MalucoWikipededista does overlap with these latest accounts, especially the characteristic typo "gramatic". I am reasonably confident the two named accounts are related to each other and to the IPs. Please verify whether PastaEditor and TheTimesARENTchanginglol are related and check for sleepers (the last time MarquinhosWikipediano was CU'd a number of sleepers showed up). For future clerks, although MarquinhosWikipediano is the master here, MalucoWikipededista ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) is the one you probably want to look at for behavioral evidence, they were much more active. GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • These accounts are  Confirmed to each other:
  • TheTimesARENTchanginglol ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) is  Likely to PastaEditor based on UA and geolocation. No sleepers.
  • no No comment with respect to IP address(es).
  • I have no data on MarquinhosWikipediano so I can't technically link them to PastaEditor. Behaviorally it certainly seems similar, but I'll let a clerk make that call. All blocked pending tags; if it's determined that they're not related, TheTimesaren'tchanging is the oldest account. Katie talk 15:20, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk note: I agree with Pudeo. Since we don't have technical data to link back to MW, I've tagged the named accounts as "suspected" (but, of course, left the blocks as CU blocks - whether or not they're MW, that's still a lot of accounts). 187.39.132.210 is active and seems fairly static, so I've blocked it for a month; the remaining IPs/ranges are more than two weeks stale. Closing. GeneralNotability ( talk) 23:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

10 October 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

The IP blocked in the last SPI continued editing instantly after the 1 month block expired on October 6. The IP requested an unblock to edit List of wars involving Brazil. Marquinhosdaswiki then started to edit the article, although hasn't racked up that many edits yet. The username is pretty obvious, either they don't care about getting caught or then they're joe-jobbed. -- Pudeo ( talk) 23:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC) Pudeo ( talk) 23:49, 10 October 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk note: Yup, looks like the IP is the same person as before, and Marquinhosdaswiki looks similar to past socks.  Blocked and tagged named account, IP blocked for three months since it's clearly not changing much. GeneralNotability ( talk) 17:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC) reply

21 November 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

IP has the same geolocation as previous ones that have caused disruption and edits the same topic area (casualties/war crimes). They also made an unblock request mentioning MarquinhosWikipediano: [15]. Not sure if they were actually affected by any rangeblock or was it just trolling. -- Pudeo ( talk) 11:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Pudeo reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. Yeah that's definitely the same person if you look through the archives. The person is editing the same exact way I tried to help with the cleanup. TheFoodofus ( talk) 16:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk note: That unblock request could be autoblock in action, or we could just be getting trolled (since they mention "editing from Marquinhosdaswiki is disabled"). Not buying the neighbor story (a, they're editing the same war crime topic area, b, residential IP addrs will rarely give you enough granularity to know that an IP is from your neighborhood). IP blocked, closing. GeneralNotability ( talk) 20:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC) reply

27 December 2020

Suspected sockpuppets

Like Jack90s15, has contributed lots to WW2 articles. Modifying of talk page archives on Jack's previous SPIs, and interaction with User:Driverofknowledge (known Jack sock) by restoring previously blanked talk page without any reason. Same sort of edit summaries on pages such as Soviet war crimes as known Jack IPs, is obsessed with 'undoing sock edits', just like some of Jack's known socks - see User:TheFoodofus. With luck a CU can check to confirm or deny my suspicions. Pahunkat ( talk) 17:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Compare the edit summaries of [16] [17] with those of confirmed jack socks [18] [19]

See filter log, I'm pretty certain that they're a sock of Jack or MarquinhosWikipediano now Pahunkat ( talk) 21:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

clearly i aint sock of any of these you mentioned, if i was, i wouldnt be searching for their sockpuppets and trying to help, i found driverofknowledge by looking into a page's edit history, also, the summaries part is non sensical, i undid what an sockpuppet made on them, then i undo my revert n soviet war crimes cuz the guy that ADDED was ALSO probably a sockpuppet, filter log means my errors, also, what the frick? persistent sockpuppetry? i just reverted his talk page to get a better understanding of that 9 year old's behaviour and see where he will attack (ww2 and footbal/emergency (police, firefighters, etc)), i aint doing exactly like jack did, its just a coincidence that i hate sockpuppeters and vandals? i just have a interest on ww2 pages like him, diference is that i am not a 9 year old that vandals while screaming "MAMA LOOK IM SO FUNNY, HAHA I VANDALIZED A WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE", i modified the talk page because i wanted to get in contact with the kid to try to understand that imbecile's reasons to vandalize, if he was just plain dumb or if he was a historical revisionist that clearly contradicts himself on war crimes (favouring axis sometimes then favouring soviets), its just plain coincidence, ALL,ill repeat, ALL of your claims make absolute non sense, i checked the edits and man, i was just undoing jack sock edits, also, if i was a sock, i wouldnt be jack, cuz if i was a jack sock, i wouldnt be attacking him, i would be attacking marquinhoswikipediano or the admins/common users, i saw about marquinhoswikipediano and when i saw jack comment, i wanted to remove it because jack is guilty, and a guilty guy commenting on another guilty guy is sus, you cant be certain that im a sock by seeing a filter log or some random reverts, you need more research, i had a reason to undo hes blank, i had a reason to comment on the investigations page (on my opinion, it shouldnt had been archived because it clearly needs to continue as this jack kid continues to sock), also, i accused an ip of being marquinhos sock because he had the same attitudes as jack and marquinhos, also, i think that marquinhos and jack are either enemy trolls or the same person making edit wars for fun, or brother, friends, something like that doing random edit wars to disrupt wikipedia (the last one is improbable). WikipedianManiac ( talk) 02:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

oh, also, i made several useful edits, so, ye, and, just saying, if i get blocked, i dont rlly care, i made my job of making useful contributions, just, dont delete my contributions :D WikipedianManiac ( talk) 02:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

The filter log is indeed interesting. ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 04:13, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

I POSTED ON THE WRONG PART REMOVE PLEASE

clearly i aint sock of any of these you mentioned, if i was, i wouldnt be searching for their sockpuppets and trying to help, i found driverofknowledge by looking into a page's edit history, also, the summaries part is non sensical, i undid what an sockpuppet made on them, then i undo my revert n soviet war crimes cuz the guy that ADDED was ALSO probably a sockpuppet, filter log means my errors, also, what the frick? persistent sockpuppetry? i just reverted his talk page to get a better understanding of that 9 year old's behaviour and see where he will attack (ww2 and footbal/emergency (police, firefighters, etc)), i aint doing exactly like jack did, its just a coincidence that i hate sockpuppeters and vandals? i just have a interest on ww2 pages like him, diference is that i am not a 9 year old that vandals while screaming "MAMA LOOK IM SO FUNNY, HAHA I VANDALIZED A WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE", i modified the talk page because i wanted to get in contact with the kid to try to understand that imbecile's reasons to vandalize, if he was just plain dumb or if he was a historical revisionist that clearly contradicts himself on war crimes (favouring axis sometimes then favouring soviets), its just plain coincidence, ALL,ill repeat, ALL of your claims make absolute non sense, i checked the edits and man, i was just undoing jack sock edits, also, if i was a sock, i wouldnt be jack, cuz if i was a jack sock, i wouldnt be attacking him, i would be attacking marquinhoswikipediano or the admins/common users, i saw about marquinhoswikipediano and when i saw jack comment, i wanted to remove it because jack is guilty, and a guilty guy commenting on another guilty guy is sus, you cant be certain that im a sock by seeing a filter log or some random reverts, you need more research, i had a reason to undo hes blank, i had a reason to comment on the investigations page (on my opinion, it shouldnt had been archived because it clearly needs to continue as this jack kid continues to sock), also, i accused an ip of being marquinhos sock because he had the same attitudes as jack and marquinhos, also, i think that marquinhos and jack are either enemy trolls or the same person making edit wars for fun, or brother, friends, something like that doing random edit wars to disrupt wikipedia (the last one is improbable). WikipedianManiac ( talk) 02:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Now there's a filter log for 'possible SPI disruption'. Pahunkat ( talk) 11:16, 28 December 2020 (UTC) reply
  • @ Oshwah: I believe WikipedianManiac is MarquinhosWikipediano ( SPI/MarquinhosWikipediano), not Jack90s15. WikipedianManiac created Battle of Montese which was earlier created by confirmed sock MalucoWikipededista (see article log). MalucoWikipededista would translate to "ManiacWikipedian" from Portuguese, by the way. Also uses the "gramatic" misspelling mentioned in earlier Marquinhos SPIs.-- Pudeo ( talk) 12:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC) reply
    • And same sort of behaviour as seen on User talk:MalucoWikipededista after being blocked. Pahunkat ( talk) 14:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC) reply
    • Also, Pastaeditor2 is a confirmed sock of MarquinhosWikipediano by CU and Marquinhosdaswiki a suspected (and blocked) sock. Pahunkat ( talk) 14:27, 29 December 2020 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I'm not sure what anyone has previously said, but the best I can do is very  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) MarquinhosWikipediano. -- zzuuzz (talk) 13:38, 29 December 2020 (UTC) reply

  • Can this SPI be closed? The mentioned accounts are all blocked. EdJohnston ( talk) 22:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC) reply

6 February 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


Initial report by various trolls with various IPs

clear sockpuppets, new ip users wouldnt know about jack or marquinhos SPI, same troll ish writing style, started editing after thefoodofus (jack sock) got blocked, attacking the same regions and making baseless arguments, saying that im a marquinhos sock just because i added content to pages he LOVES to vandalize, and insisting on vandalism and historical revisionism, deleting parts of articles, even though it had sources (yes it was repeatedly remade by socks but, it has sources so it should had gotten reviewed and evaluated and if its alright, let it), so i ask for further investigation, also, 1 of them got a 36 hour block for vandalism on this IP. (i know about this because im a old ip user from 2018, i know about jack and marquinhos, mostly jack, i saw his entire sockpuppeting career) 2804:14D:4488:201C:2419:1D75:86CB:C1D8 ( talk) 16:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

the 2nd ip is a clear block evasion and impersonating account, he claims everyone that doesnt have his POV is its ya boi josh (marquinhos puppet) 2804:14D:4488:201C:2419:1D75:86CB:C1D8 ( talk) 16:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

the 3rd is clearly another sock, im going to roll back to my additions. 2804:14D:4488:201C:2419:1D75:86CB:C1D8 ( talk) 16:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

now this retarded 9 year old is impersonating as me. UltraWikipedian ( talk) 17:09, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

A few weeks ago ItsYaBoiJosh and Its YaBoi Josh 2, along with various IPs, were involved in some sort of trolling. This involved edit warring over several articles and this SPI, each IP accusing each other of either being a sock of Jack90s15 or WikipedianManiac, and eventually Oshwah blocked them for sockpuppetry. There were also two accounts created, ItsYaBoiJosh and ItsYaBoiJosh2. At the time, CU data didn't seem to conclusively connect either account to either MarquinhosWikipediano or Jack90s15.

Today, we had an almost identical repeat of that experience, involving:

And the two accounts UltraWikipedian and UltraWikipedian2.

I'm requesting a CU to see if today's new accounts can be connected to either master. I think this may be MarquinhosWikipediano, given that the talk page abuse after being blocked is identical to that of the account WikipedianManiac ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki). Pahunkat ( talk) 17:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

the first ip is clearly ultrawikipedian, and the second is clearly jack, theyre probably using some sort of proxy. Mariothecoolpumbler ( talk) 10:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I blocked both UltraWikipedian and UltraWikipedian2. Perhaps y'all can unravel the socking. Good hand/bad hand? There were also behaviors that needed to be stopped. Both UltraWikipedian's were created today and fought over the same articles. I protected Soviet war crimes because of the many edit warriors. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:31, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Geez, what a mess.  Confirmed UltraWikipedian, ItsYaBoiJosh, Marquinhosdaswiki, WikipedianManiac match. The IPs match combatants here. I haven't seen anyone who isn't blocked already, nor any that shouldn't be blocked. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 19:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC) reply
  • I don't really care who is who; this whole thing is warring sockfarms. If someone feels a need to sort 'em out beyond "yes, there is annoying foolery going on", they're welcome to analyze further. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 04:08, 7 February 2021 (UTC) reply

09 March 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Edits essentially claiming to be socks, requesting CU for sleepers. Might also be worth protecting this SPI since they seem to be obsessed with it DannyS712 ( talk) 02:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

30 March 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Admitted, see edits (though the edit summaries have since been revision deleted) DannyS712 ( talk) 02:12, 30 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Clarification: I only reported "ZaZooZee1.1 from Brazil.", the other users listed where added by others -- DannyS712 ( talk) 17:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC) reply
@ Zzuuzz: can I suggest protecting this page? The socks seem to be active messing with it -- DannyS712 ( talk) 03:27, 31 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • It also looks like they are back to editing the same pages they did before they were blocked

https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Allied_war_crimes_during_World_War_II&action=history

  • They are now back to the Soviet crimes page editing the same way the other socks did before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Soviet_war_crimes&action=history

  • They are also trolling this page as they always do when they are discovered.

/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MarquinhosWikipediano/Archive#Clerk,_CheckUser,_and/or_patrolling_admin_comments_4

Curlpercy ( talk) 17:35, 30 March 2021 (UTC) reply

ZaZooZee is an obvious DUCK. Pahunkat ( talk) 17:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC) reply

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

pahunkat '-' ???????????? what do you mean by duck my dude? are you ok on the head? i dont quack or anything im not a duck, what does it mean? and why are you joining the sock? pretty sus. i shouldnt even be here, i dont know the heck is happening, im just here because i was checking on allied war crimes and i saw a edit war with marquinhoswikipediano being cited, i researched a bit on his behaviour in monday and, today, im here fighting with another one of his socks over a retaliatory report by an obvious marquinhoswikipediano sock, my life is pretty strange. curlpercy is the duck here, he knows so much about behaviour of marquinhos sock even though he is a new user, run a CU on him and some fun things will probably appear. Dojyaan! ZaZooZee was here! ( talk) 17:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

hello, uh, sorry for the misunderstanding, im salvaging some edits because they had sources, if anything is wrong, im terribly sorry, you can go there, fix it and tell me what happened though, as said on my userpage, i try to do the right thing, if i do something wrong, let me know please. also, i got a warning that someone tried accessing my account, dont know if its this dude or other but im still scared, also, yes i saw that a marquinhos sock added these things on the page, problem is: they werent added exactly by him, he just re-added them into the page, though, these also had sources, on allied war crimes its other thing, a random IP user removed a big chunk from the soviet part then another IP started adding it and other ip removing, then the 2 marquinhos socks started doing the same, the bombing of gorla part the same, a ip added, other removed and then the 2 socks came and fought over it, im just re-adding this content as it has sources for it, as said before, anything wrong with my edit? fix and tell me, im here trying to do the right thing. also, why are you trying to so hard to block me man? do you have anything with me? im not "adding like the socks did", im salvaging edits from a imbecile sock, ive researched and the things added were not even added by him, but by other people, things that were removed by others and that, sadly, even with sources, werent added back, these things also have sources and are important to the page, and the nkvd order thing wasnt about a war yet just a domestic policy of the USSR. curlpercy, trolling? seriously? talking normally is trolling for you? im starting to think that you maybe have something with this sock, seriously man, are you sure talking normally with someone is trolling? im just saying that if i did something wrong u can fix and tell me, trolling would be like "LOL ME SOCK LOL ME SOCK LOL ME SOCK LOL ME SOCK", not normal talking, if i was a sock, would i be explaining or would i be just vandalizing more? i also have over 100 edits and 4 days of editing, im already a kind-of estabilished user, just some small similarities dont directly say that im a sockpuppet, please refrain from some things youre saying, your accusations agaisnt me are seriously, sorry for the word, dumb, it doesnt make sense, like, im totally different from the dude but because of 3 things i did im automatically him? alright, ive also noticed that my IP range is similar to his, alright im getting blocked cuz of the IP range, shouldnt had bought the house im living right now. about me tagging a account as a marquinhos sock, i checked the SPI and i saw both accounts were confirmed to be socks, so i tagged them as i think the admins forgot to do it. Dojyaan! ZaZooZee was here! ( talk) 17:35, 30 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

The three accounts are blocked as socks of previous socks, or similar, or near enough. Plus a couple of sleepers. Since they would like tags, no tags thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC) reply

09 April 2021

Suspected sockpuppets


looks like an obvious sock of MarquinhosWikipediano they re-added all the edits https://en.wikipedia.org/?target=When+the+wiki+is+sus&namespace=all&tagfilter=&start=&end=&limit=50&title=Special%3AContributions. That their other stock account added, and their username is also using the trollish writing style they like to use. I am requesting also to check for sleepers since they make multiple accounts after their other accounts get blocked. Curlpercy ( talk) 15:37, 9 April 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • This case is being reviewed by Blablubbs as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
    Pink clock Awaiting administrative action –   Looks like a duck to me ( [20] [21] [22]), please block the sock indefinitely.  No tags, please. Thanks and best, Blablubbs| talk 16:45, 9 April 2021 (UTC) reply

 Blocked and tagged Obvious sock per WP:DUCK. I'm not seeing any reason to not tag this account given that this person is playing games with unblock requests - reviewing admins need to know which sock this account is of. Nick-D ( talk) 02:43, 10 April 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Nick-D, it's your call – my recommendation was per this CU comment and the fact that this SPI (and a bunch of related ones) are troll fests, so I think WP:DENY outweighs the benefits of the actual tag; the relevant SPI can always be noted in the block log. Blablubbs| talk 09:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC) reply

05 May 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

In March, User:ZaZooZee, a blocked and globally locked sock of User:Marquinhos, posted this edit request on Talk:Holocaust victims, and User:ZaZooZee1.1 from Brazil made multiple edits to the resulting thread before both were blocked and locked. A couple of days ago, the IP User:187.39.133.201 made virtually the same request [23], marking the IP as a DUCK sock.

In addition, another editor suggested to me that User:TheTankMan001 was also a related sock. Note that TheTankMan001's user page [24] is virtually identical to ZaZooZee's [25], and they have the same sub-pages in their user space [26], [27]. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 00:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Beyond My Ken, not User:Marquinhos, who is an editor in good standing, and an admin on the Portuguese wiki. Thanks, Drmies ( talk) 14:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
It's irrelevant who suggested that TheTankMan001 was a related sock. The suggestion was made, I evaluated it, and I decided to include it in this report based on what I found. The identity of the editor is not important, just think of them as a little birdie. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 00:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
Considering this remark, please do check for sleepers, as I cannot identify the account who made the edits to Spanish Civil War mentioned in it - if it's not a red herring. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

You talk too much
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
  • hello sir, well, at first, who is marquinhos wikipediano and who is zazoozee? the userboxes i got we're copied from other user's userboxes, and, im on high school, does that mean im him? also, by the way, i live on brazil, though i dont know if we are from the same state or city. dojyannn, TheTankMan001 is here! ( talk) 00:51, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • yet again, i do not know anyone, i think youre misunderstanding, if i have similarities with him, well, sorry, i will change my userpage if you want, though having the same interests doesn't mean im him, also, what's DUCK and sock? i dont know these things, i made a account recently just to read wikipedia, then i started to contribute to some pages i used on my school projects and stuff adding more information to them, i dont know anything about any marquinhos, zazoozee, zazoozee from brazil or anything. dojyannn, TheTankMan001 is here! ( talk) 00:55, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • also, who's that user that suposedly told you that im this marquinhos dude? (my name is not marcos, a common brazilian name by the way), i checked your talk page and there wasnt anyone saying anything about that. dojyannn, TheTankMan001 is here! ( talk) 00:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • irrelevant? or non existent? i didnt see any message, can you link me to that supposed message you "evaluated and decided to include on the report based on what you found"?my identity is not important? it is if youre accusing me of something i didnt do, i do not know who you, marquinhos, zazoozee, zazoozee from brazil or anyone here are, im here just to edit stuff mainly about the country i live and its politics, well, guess im not welcome on wikipedia, as they say, you can try but sometimes it just doesnt work, i just cant contribute as someone that you think i am is talking about something, though, theres the massive chance that the dude messaging you was just a troll that got mad because i edited something (historical revisionists), was it the dude that was vandalizing and insisting tibet wasnt protected by britain? dojyannn, TheTankMan001 is here! ( talk) 01:04, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • can you tell me on what revision of your talk page has this supposed report by someone calling me a sockpuppet? if it mentions anything about tibet, protectorate or anything, you know its the historical revisionist. dojyannn, TheTankMan001 is here! ( talk) 01:09, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • apparently, you or someone spammed my edit filter log with "persistent sockpuppetry", and, when i did these edits, they werent there, they appeared recently. dojyannn, TheTankMan001 is here! ( talk) 01:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • ive looked at holocaust victims talk page, theres no reports there, its just you fighting with a random IP user over nothing and assuming that its him, saying you will tell mods and stuff. theres no one other than you and him even touching that talk page, also, "SPI filled', ok, file on him, what do i have to do with him? "block evading sock", maybe he is? who knows? i just dont want to get involved on this, "archiving this", ok, i dont really care about this page, i never even touched it nor its talk page, i do not have interest in holocaust or nazism. dojyannn, TheTankMan001 is here! ( talk) 01:28, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • alright, who is marquinhoswikipediano? i dont know neither marquinhos nor marquinhoswikipediano if you are willing to bring in a investigation for the IP user, you can, i just dont want to be involved in anything of this, the ip user's edit and zazoozee edits do seem similar, and i agree with you that it looks suspicious, but i dont have anything with marquinhoswikipediano, marquinhos, zazoozee, zazoozee 1.1 from brazil or this IP user. dojyannn, TheTankMan001 is here! ( talk) 01:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • if you block this IP user, it wont really affect anything on me, i do not have interest to edit on nazi or holocaust-related pages, neither i know anyone mentioned, i will even be grateful that a possible sock is blocked dojyannn, TheTankMan001 is here! ( talk) 01:39, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • It's like a duck beating me over the head with...uh...duck things.  Blocked without tags intentionally per notes in the archive, Redirect arrow Global lock(s) requested. CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - sleeper check, please. GeneralNotability ( talk) 01:43, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • CU note: I already checked real quick, but I'd like for someone with some experience with this case to run it--there's a few obvious things visible there, but I don't know what I might be missing. And maybe some rangeblocks will result from this, if only to shut this person up, cause they talk too much. Drmies ( talk) 02:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • I threw in TheTankMan002 as well, CU-confirmed. Drmies ( talk) 14:26, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Leaving untagged (though I did blank), closing. Blablubbs| talk 14:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC) reply

22 May 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

Edit summaries, SPA jumping into same topic area Pahunkat ( talk) 13:07, 22 May 2021 (UTC) reply

When I was watching the recent changes I cam across them on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Allied_war_crimes_during_World_War_II&action=history. It looks like ever month they do this maybe we should block the ip range as they do this ever month /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MarquinhosWikipediano/Archive. From September 2020 to now they have been doing this nonstop.

The Ip I added edited ever page that MarquinhosWikipediano as done and its in the same Ip range also they are talking the same as the other socks (you talk WAYYYY too much, vandal). Mr.Jakub from prague ( talk) 14:04, 22 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). Same geolocation, different user agents and ranges. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 21:41, 22 May 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Closing as the given account and IP are both already blocked without tags. Mz7 ( talk) 21:48, 22 May 2021 (UTC) reply

17 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

I believe this may be marquinhoswikpediano. Do to them continuously making new accounts in the middle or end of the month and always adding massive amounts. Of sentences to whatever they edit to the admin or admins, reviewing this case look back in the archive of this case and you'll see the behavioral evidences. Mr.Jakub from prague ( talk) 02:05, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

When looking at their most recent accounts and their editing Style. They immediately pick a WW2 page, [28] [ [29]]and try to add mountains of text to the page. Also on their user page they usually say that they have had an account or that their in school [30] [31].When looking at what they wrote for this talk page [32] and what they wrote for the Red Army page [33] you could see the similarities for them in the editing.

@ Oshwah: @ Favonian: @ GeneralNotability: @ Drmies: I added the Ip that was Cu blocked 2 times. It looks like it is being used again by them do to the block expiring, I pinged you 4 guys since you are most recent admins to deal with this. and now it looks like they are back to making multiple accounts looking at the page history its definitely them. Mr.Jakub from prague ( talk) 03:50, 24 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. hello good sir, i would like to know why am i being investigated? i did nothing, i just like my country and im contributing to a article about recent events, about ww2, im not really much interested in it, anyways, good luck, and, if you need any help, you can contact me, if this was just a misunderstanding, its ok, everyone makes mistakes, now i will go back to edit my article, if you need anything, you can contact me. Private Hans' Flammenwerfer ( talk) 18:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC) reply

in addition, how would you tell that "its definitely" a sock just by me editing a page and being created in the end of a month and, "adding mountains of text to admins" (im not doing that)? that's literally not proof for a ban, and, the fact that i'm in school also doesn't prove anything, read /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Don%27t_be_quick_to_assume_that_someone_is_a_sockpuppet#Sockophobia, by your acting, you are looking pretty much like a troll, pinging multiple mods and saying "look at the page history its definitely themmmmmm", anyways, im pulling out of this conversation, good luck with the other dude, and, hope you guys have a good day, bye Private Hans' Flammenwerfer ( talk) 18:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I need more information. How do you know that the MarquinhosWikipediano account and the FictiousLibrarian account are both controlled by the same person? Do you have diffs that show similar edits, similar editing patterns, or other evidence that explicitly links these two accounts to the same person? I need to have this evidence before I can proceed... ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  •  Clerk endorsed - I see almost enough similarity to block on behavior alone, but there's also enough that's different that having CU confirmation would be a good thing. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:33, 28 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  • FictiousLibrarian is Red X Unrelated to MarquinhosWikipediano. There was an account that appeared in the check as confirmed to FictiousLibrarian, but FictiousLibrarian appears to be a legitimate clean start of that account (see FictiousLibrarian's first edit). For these reasons, I would close this SPI case without action. Mz7 ( talk) 16:59, 30 June 2021 (UTC) reply

26 June 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

As suggested by @ Oshwah: I am filing another report as this user is doing the same exact things as previous socks have done when they are caught [34] [35]. They have the same thing on their user page as previous socks Hi there, I'm Private Hans' Flammenwerfer. I'm from São Paulo, (Brazil and i'm on Junior year at high school) ( im on junior year at high school, im from Brazil.) [36] Mr.Jakub from prague ( talk) 02:10, 26 June 2021 (UTC) They also removed that I reported them and a link to page they are socking on [37] [38]. Mr.Jakub from prague ( talk) 02:15, 26 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims. as i said before, extreme sockophobia, trying to blame me just because i like my country, theres nothing wrong with liking my country, also, i removed my name from the list as the mod said that you dont have any proof for that, yet again, "same thing in the userpage" doesnt prove anything, there are over 100 million people from the state of sao paulo in brazil, and millions are also on junior year at high school, also, yet again, i removed because the mod said so, and, "socking on"? so i cant edit a page about my country, im a sock for doing it, curious huh, the way you are trying so hard to get me and the other dude banned seems much like some really bad faith thing, as youre so obssesed with "socks", it already raises quite a suspicion that..... maybe, you are a sock? your name is also quite similar to some previous marquinhos socks as ive seen here such as From Brazil with love, ZaZooZee1.1 from Brazil and Sao Paulo man (a thing this marquinhos dude usually does, having quite similar names and usually just months apart, always pointing out their location, hes also been seen to use proxies on USA and other countries, by the way). Private Hans' Flammenwerfer ( talk) 17:11, 26 June 2021 (UTC) reply

just editing the same page doesnt mean anything, and, im not adding similar content, neither my edit patterns are similar, by the way, marquinhos usually edits ww2 pages, have i edited a single one page about ww2? or even war in general? he usually also edits the same pages he previously did, en masse, while i edited just 2021 Brazilian protests, i dont understand also how would you so easily point out other users as socks with almost no proof or reason to, which also backs up my point that, youre either doing it on good faith but isnt very knowledgeable about wikipedia, or youre a troll/sock or vandal doing that on bad faith. Private Hans' Flammenwerfer ( talk) 17:14, 26 June 2021 (UTC) reply

another thing i found quite strange, this behaviour you have (going to random mod accounts and reporting others) is a similar thing marquinhos socks do ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk%3AFavonian&type=revision&diff=1030222383&oldid=1029810222, compare it to previous blocked marquinhos socks, usually either reporting their own accounts or reporting other random users usually on bad faith, especially when the users are agaisnt that person) and even bringing it to admin noticeboards (note that, the one you reported is a clear sock, but, marquinhos socks usually reported their own socks during their trolling. Private Hans' Flammenwerfer ( talk) 17:19, 26 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Pink clock Awaiting administrative action - per CU, please block the sock indefinitely. -- Blablubbs| talk 08:58, 27 June 2021 (UTC) reply
  •  Blocked and tagged - TNT 😺 19:06, 28 June 2021 (UTC) reply

26 September 2021

Suspected sockpuppets

When looking at the Sockpuppet investigation page and there page history [39] they edit the same pages the same way and they ask to be unblocked from a Ip That was blocked. The emu of wiki ( talk) 13:14, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Blocked without tags, but CU may still be relevant as there have been "false positives" in the past. Favonian ( talk) 13:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • If they've not yelled in 13 days... ~ TNT (she/her • talk) 22:58, 9 October 2021 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/MarquinhosWikipediano/Archive&oldid=1049115649"