From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Kcosip

Kcosip ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

26 July 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Continually editing at Dadvan Yousuf referring to "WP:NPOV" in edit summaries. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 11:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Following are  Confirmed to each other: Wikibot91, Hansoltokjtiji, Hanistermalo29384, Pontenopoles11009, Quanstzurri998 & HaLIHianl. Kanimultan is  Stale but the behaviour makes it look very likely. Janistuon is technically Red X Unrelated but the behaviour makes me think this is meatpuppetry.  Blocked and tagged. Closing. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 11:45, 26 July 2023 (UTC) reply

28 July 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

After page protection and a bunch of accounts blocked, two IPs have appeared at Talk:Dadvan Yousuf. Obvious block evasion is obvious. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 19:19, 28 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Add one more. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 20:30, 28 July 2023 (UTC) reply
And yet another one. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 18:35, 30 July 2023 (UTC) reply
And another one. Other evidence includes their talk of neutrality and misinformation (including saying that "some users will have to report [me] for spreading misinformation". Lavalizard101 ( talk) 08:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply
And another one, yet more talk of "neutrality". Lavalizard101 ( talk) 10:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply
More evidence using the exact same wording on talk page posts 2001 IP MManohermno203. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 11:18, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Callanecc: pinging admin who blocked the last lot and protected the article. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 11:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Lavalizard101 Callanecc didn't protected the article nor its talk page. ToadetteEdit ( chat)/( logs) 12:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply
Correcting self. he blocked the socks. it was @ Ingenuity: who protected the article. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 12:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply
One more. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 11:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply
And another one requesting RFPP for the talk page. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 11:49, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply
And yet another one, that makes 9 IPs in at least 6 different ranges and 1 account so far. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 11:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply
What a surprise that the IPs are proxies, given the different ranges. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 14:07, 31 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

MManohermano203 is an obvious one. First edits were repeating the above IPs at Talk:Dadvan Yousuf and both begin edit summaries with "IMHO". – 2. O. Boxing 15:01, 30 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Also a confirmed sock HaLIHianl tried gaming autoconfirmed the same way with removing advertorial wording and phrasing. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 19:12, 30 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Qcne (talk) 12:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Maybe this one? New editor, edited the article to do nothing but add in some fluff about education and moving the criminal proceedings to lower on the page.
Qcne (talk) 13:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply
No sock. I just put the controversy context in the controversy section.
Info about apprenticeship is publicly available and was in earlier versions. Rastojun ( talk) 14:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

10 August 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

brand new account yesterday created a Teahouse post wanting to add an image to Dadvan Yousuf. Today an IP claiming to be the brand new account has made a new post claiming misinformation surrounding the same thing as the socks about the controversy bottom paragraph. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 14:01, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Now I am sad I went into the Teahouse conversation in good faith :( It does look like they are the problematic sockpuppets. I hope my language cleanup edits to the article, were okay, and hopefully VioKleraBam can make some good amendments? Qcne (talk) 14:04, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply
I think VioKleraBam may be a sock, before today they last edited march 2022 then conveniently returned the same day as the IP and also used the "WP:NPOV" edit summary of confirmed socks back in 2022 as well, also claiming that the paragraph is sourced only to Inside Paradeplatz and that Inside Paradeplatz is unreliable for some reason. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 16:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply
@ Drmies: has checkuser blocked VioKleraBam and Lupin6PainTendo. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 16:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply
I've just noticed, VioKleraBam tried gaming autoconfirmed the same way with removing advertorial wording and phrasing as previous socks. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 17:25, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kcosip is probs related. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 18:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply
Hey @ Lavalizard101. Another Teahouse question about Dadvan's page by a new IP editor . Here's the version. Qcne (talk) 16:07, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply
And potentially another user: who has replied to that Teahouse thread, exact same style of writing, account created today @ Lavalizard101. The version. Qcne (talk) 18:20, 16 August 2023 (UTC) reply
Another? . Similar Teahouse q. Qcne (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk since there are quite a few accounts overall. MarioGom ( talk) 19:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC) reply
  •  Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es).. – bradv 19:57, 19 August 2023 (UTC) reply

10 August 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Kcosip seems to be the oldest of a series of socks fluffing up Dadvan Yousuf. It's all in such poor taste. The editor must have forgotten their old passwords, and so revealed Kcosip, Vahieran, and Imhatm. I see no technical connection to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kanimultan--but if we were to judge on behavior (including phrasing and other habits) I'd have them blocked per DUCK. (See also comments by User:Lavalizard101.) Drmies ( talk) 16:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Drmies ( talk) 16:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I've just noticed, VioKleraBam tried gaming autoconfirmed the same way with removing advertorial wording and phrasing as the socks of Kanimultan so even more WP:DUCK evidence. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 17:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Drmies: Are these confirmed to each other? Given than now two are confirmed to Kanimultan, I think it would make sense to merge the case. MarioGom ( talk) 19:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Merged, re-tagged, closing. On archival, we might want to consider re-ordering the reports chronologically. MarioGom ( talk) 14:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC) reply

23 August 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Obvious sock is obvious, overlap at Dadvan Yousuf, other edits have been to remove advertorial language similar to confirmed socks HaLIHianl and MManohermano203 Lavalizard101 ( talk) 15:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Given the users history for creating multiple socks a check might be an idea for sleepers. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 15:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC) reply
I'm not a Sock. The only edit I made is that I moved controversy text to the controversy section of the wiki article Dadvan Yousuf.
I did not add or delete anything. Rastojun ( talk) 15:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  •  Clerk endorsed - as duck as it can get, endorsing CU for sleepers given the persistence, but please, block anyway. Thank you. MarioGom ( talk) 17:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply
  •  In progress - the reported account is  Confirmed, and there's at least one more, give me a minute... Girth Summit (blether) 18:31, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Actually, scratch that. Looking more closely, the other account is on the same IP, and using an identical UA, but there's a couple of weeks in between the edits and the behaviour looks very different. I think it's more likely either a shared device, or just coincidence about the UA. Blocking this account, closing. Girth Summit (blether) 18:35, 24 August 2023 (UTC) reply

03 October 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Use of similar edit summaries and editing styles. Nagol0929 ( talk) 12:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

15 October 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

More IP socks at Talk:Dadvan Yousuf. The 217 IP was used back in July (see archive) and the 2001 IP is claiming the article is bias as is usual for this socker. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 20:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • No activities from those IPs since 15 October 2023. Closing. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:09, 15 November 2023 (UTC) reply

03 December 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

Just a few days after semi-protection has expired a bunch of new accounts show up at Dadvan Yousuf over a few days, a favourite page of the sock master. One of which (Dennisr1201) was created back in July before the first round of socking got caught, but didn't edit the page until a few days ago. Lavalizard101 ( talk) 18:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

18 February 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

Jansaberzutni just immediately started with ( [7]) removing the AFD notice of Dadvan Yousuf, one of this sockpuppet's favourite to edit articles, before ( [8]) adding what appeared to be a word soup of Wikipedia-related jargon.

The IP also seems to be adding comments with no substance ( [9], [10]). —Matrix(!) ( a good person!) Citation not needed at all; thank you very much 17:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Named account already blocked and tagged due to a second SPI filing, IP is likely stale at this point. The Wordsmith Talk to me 01:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

23 February 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

There is no doubt in my mind that Jansaberzutni is another sock, "reasserting" notability as if they've been here forever. Sprezzio, IMO, is a sleeper account created at the same time, and is therefore CU blocked. Drmies ( talk) 21:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC) Drmies ( talk) 21:53, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Kcosip/Archive&oldid=1217271279"