Obvious not-new user shows up after having been slept for years and starts adding details on a famous persons pederasty? Quack?
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk endorsed, this is unlikely to be a new user. Tim Song ( talk) 06:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
They're completely different edit patterns, and Prince6309 is completely inconclusive on behavior. No action taken at this time. – MuZemike 18:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Since creation of this account on April 14, this user has made a grand total of three edits (the other two edits on April 29 and May 11), all which were comments on my talk page requsting that I restore material that I deleted from a banned user (the suspected sock puppet). This account was created with the sole purpose of communicating with me under an identity I would not recognize.-- Tonalone ( talk) 04:42, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note: moved from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MelodiousEros, please see there for original history. Spitfire Tally-ho! 17:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
Checkuser note: Unrelated; they are from different continents. No other likely socks on the IP range. Risker ( talk) 04:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |