-
Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki)
09 July 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Draft:Sachin Kapur is exactly the same as
before. Master is globally locked so please do the same for the sock as well.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider) 20:57, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Merged to oldest I could find. SachinDrKapur has been locked since the report was filed, and the others were locked already. Tagged all. Close.
Dreamy Jazz
talk to me |
my contributions 22:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
reply
15 July 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Writing about Sachin Kapur + username pattern. Duck evidence so I've gone ahead and reported to SRG.
Giraffer (
talk·
contribs) 22:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
21 August 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
xWiki CU request, logging for the record ~
TNT (she/they •
talk) 00:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
24 August 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Both account was created when User:AssimAlHakeem got block. I found them following their edit trail.
User:AssimAlHakeem uploaded
c:File:Dr Sachin Kapur Stylish Picture.jpg on commons. On 21 August,
User:ZamZam-WS created
Sachin Kapur (Q108179917) and used
c:File:Dr Sachin Kapur Stylish Picture.jpg. On 24 August, "User:Islamic Scholar Encyclopedia" created
d:Q108208230 and used
Sachin Kapur (Q108179917) item as "Property:P737 (influenced by)". Looks like they are promoting "Sachin Kapur". I am suspecting they are sock. please check them. They are active here on enwiki, as WP:BLOCKEVASION enwiki should block them.
আফতাবুজ্জামান (
talk) 20:56, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
CheckUser requested and endorsed by clerk - I'm hesitant to make any judgement about Bishillah-WS based on just a single edit. I do, however, remember seeing another account name with -WS while I was looking around this case a while ago, but I didn't note it at the time. The fact that Bismillah-WS and Islamic Scholar Encyclopedia both created accounts shortly after AssimAlHakeem was blocked raises a flag. Beyond that, I'm mostly seeing shared interest in contemporary Islamic clerics/scholars, which is just as likely to be multiple people responding to some off-wiki urging as it is socking. Based on the precceding alone, I would probably not endorse, but there's already several confirmed socks in the archives, so it seems likely there's more. I've also spotted some
WP:BEANS which I've made notes about. --
RoySmith
(talk) 17:33, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The following are
Confirmed to
SachinKapurD:
-
Happyrancho (
talk
+ ·
tag ·
contribs ·
deleted contribs ·
logs ·
filter log ·
block user ·
spi block ·
block log ·
CA ·
CheckUser(
log) ·
investigate ·
cuwiki) is
Possible, maybe
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely).
-
Callanecc (
talk •
contribs •
logs) 11:34, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
reply
28 August 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
Account created purely to violate Wikipedia policy and to continue promoting
Physics Wallah, who is an old favourite of the master. See
Draft:PHYSICS WALLAH as well as
this revealing edit, essentially admitting to being a sockpuppet of a blocked account.
Spiderone
(Talk to Spider) 07:33, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
19 September 2021
Suspected sockpuppets
New account created straight after the previous sockpuppet was blocked. Creates the article at
Mizanur Rahman (preacher) (
|
talk |
history |
protect |
delete |
links |
watch |
logs |
views), previous sockpuppet was active at the draft version at
Draft:Mizanur Rahman Azhari.
FDW777 (
talk) 10:42, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
reply
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
13 July 2022
Suspected sockpuppets
Created after the last sock with over 800 edits was blocked.
[1]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
- Interesting. @CU: On the cuwiki, you will find the "Wikipedia/bn/Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub" page. When i was bnwiki's CU, i added that page. You can match the results with that. --
আফতাবুজ্জামান (
talk) 23:32, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
-
Clerk endorsed - there's enough here to raise suspicions. Since cuwiki data exists, I think comparison to that would be helpful. Thanks,
Spicy (
talk) 00:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
-
In progress - --
RoySmith
(talk) 13:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely. Other than geolocating to the same general area, the CU data mentioned by
আফতাবুজ্জামান doesn't match. The behavior described here (updating biographical data on cinema performers) is endemic, so doesn't say much. --
RoySmith
(talk) 13:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
- Hmm, "unlikely" might be a big excessive. Maybe more like
Possible, but it's still nebulous enough that I wouldn't give it any weight. --
RoySmith
(talk) 13:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
reply
25 April 2023
Suspected sockpuppets
Usmanmaifada has created
Yasser Al-Dosari, which was previously created by another sock from this farm,
Xpërt100. Usmanmaifada also shares with the other Dr Sachin Kapur Fanclub socks the habit of responding to UTP messages in a similar manner and broken English. The topics of interest are around religion and Saudi Arabia, although not exclusively. I realise this isn't much as evidence goes, but maybe worth a look? --
DoubleGrazing (
talk) 08:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See
Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Since we have some info on cuwiki from a Bangladeshi colleague I ran a check to compare. Usmanmaifada is very
Unlikely, unless they've moved to a different continent. They regularly use two large ranges that are anonblocked because of the massive amount of spam coming from them (there is a /16 blocked for ten years; CUs probably know exactly what range I'm referring to) but they don't match with any other users or logged-out edits that I can see. However, on
Yasser Al-Dosari (a page previously created by
Xpërt100) they have added a block of text that Earwig shows has been reproduced in numerous places on the web, some CC and some not, and so far I can't get to the bottom of what the original source is, but it seems very likely that Usmanmaifada has reproduced it here from a promotional source that has been supplied to them; in other words,
undisclosed paid editing. They've already received two uw-upe notices and haven't responded, that's not promising. Since it's fairly certain they're not a sock I'm going to close this, but will proceed with the next warning in that series.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits) 14:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
reply
- Thank you @
Ivanvector for your efforts here, and sorry to have led you on a chase of ducks which turned out to be mere wild geese. :) --
DoubleGrazing (
talk) 14:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
reply