From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CodyCruickshank

CodyCruickshank ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CodyCruickshank/Archive.


16 June 2024

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

User is editing same pages as 49.3.90.25 and 49.3.90.116, which had previously been blocked for block evasion . Edits from 49.193.150.69 only began when these previous users were blocked. BryanGaensler ( talk) 21:57, 16 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Comparing these two diffs: edit by 49.193.150.69 and 49.3.90.25 (previous blocked IP), looks like he likes to 'neaten' up the table code by adding spaces where there isn't (for 49.193.150.69 diff, scroll down and look at 49, 50, 51 entries). —  AP 499D25 (talk) 23:44, 17 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Already blocked, nothing left to do here. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 11:39, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply

21 June 2024

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

See also prior block logs for the following IPs: 220.236.126.177 110.175.242.146 220.236.119.43 49.3.90.116

This IP is only active on certain pages frequently edited by these previous ones, the most recent edit on the "2024 NRL Season" page is basically a carbon copy of previous edits made by 49.3.90.116. Obviously early days to be reporting this but anyone who's been involved with this guy's previous account/IPs should be able to recognise him. PhinsUp23 ( talk) 10:11, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

User:PhinsUp23, this particular IP user has already been reported above several days earlier, so I suggest checking this SPI page for an existing report before making one next time. Secondly, keep in mind that on an SPI, Checkusers can't use the Checkuser tool on IP addresses, they can only use it in account-to-account scenarios. Regards, —  AP 499D25 (talk) 04:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the heads up mate, never done of these reports before but good to know from now on. PhinsUp23 ( talk) 04:51, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments