This isn't sockpuppetry per se; the IP just registered an account. The IP was blocked with anonblock, so I guess it's tentatively okay that they have an account. I'm closing for now, but to the clerk who archives this: are you okay with me closing this with no action? —
HelloAnnyong(say whaaat?!) 00:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)reply
I would be ok with this if there was no edits to the account during the blocks, but there are contribs from the 7th, so this is block evasion. Otherwise I would have archived this. If you do block the account, I would not indef it but match it to the IP. If we go to more socks, then indef. --
DQ (t) (e) 11:55, 10 May 2011 (UTC)reply
DQ, the suspected sock hasn't edited since this case was opened, so I'm closing without further action. —
HelloAnnyong(say whaaat?!) 13:16, 14 May 2011 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: recommend that if this account continues to cause issues they are dealt with via AIV, as the anon-block involved here makes this case a bit odd for SPI.
SpitfireTally-ho! 16:30, 14 May 2011 (UTC)reply