If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mod objective}} to the checkuser page
here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on
Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a
Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
122.111.31.48 (
talk·contribs) has just appeared. His first 2 edits continue the previous pattern of Davidamos/Mod objective/La Bible, with the same unsourced content going into the same articles. -
LisaLiel (
talk) 11:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Technically entirely Unrelated -- different continent.
Sam Korn(smoddy) 15:38, 20 October 2008 (UTC)reply
User UrianUreka appeared on the Yahweh talk page in support of Kght, with no history, and immediately stated that he was beginning to suspect the admins here -- "beginning" indicates a history, and there is no history for this user. Further, the viewpoint supported by Kght is so utterly fringe (that the Lachish letter -- which has no vowels -- proves that "Yahweh" is the correct pronunciation) that it is extremely unlikely for a random new user to hold the same unusual belief.
SkyWriter (Tim) (
talk) 15:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC)reply
N.B. I've blocked this account, as it's clearly the same person trying to carry on their absurd argument. If, unexpectedly, the account cannot be substantiated as a sock, please unblock. —
Gareth Hughes (
talk) 18:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). No comment with respect to IP address(es). Technical evidence indicates that
User:UrianUreka is the same user as
User:Mod objective et. al. --
Avi (
talk) 18:57, 12 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Kght (
talk·contribs) This user has immediately resumed the contacts and discussions of the Davidamos socks -- even to the point of directly addressing LisaLiel on her talk page.
SkyWriter (Tim) (
talk) 17:47, 2 October 2008 (UTC)reply
User:Kght has just appeared, and seems to be yet another sock of the same person. Can this be checked, please? And is there any way to prevent this serial abuser from being able to continue his misbehavior?
LisaLiel (
talk) 17:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Adding
Kurdle12 (
talk·contribs). Appeared and steamed straight into talk page discussions (and village pump) just where the preious socks left off.
Jheald (
talk) 18:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)reply
And what misbehaviour is that? Have I made any modifications to any article. No. Why would it be in anyones interest to return to wikipedia to simply be a vandal. Look at my discussions. I'm trying to prevent the real vandals from deleting more and more or articles which have been agreed on. I've been peacably talking to various members
Kght (
talk) 18:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC).reply
Once again I forgot to notify the latest username of the checkuser. In spite of my mistake, he found his way here... again.
SkyWriter (Tim) (
talk) 18:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Finally, Tweedledum and Tweedledee appeared at about the same time and addressed me on my talk page as Garzo. Garzo is an admin that the Alleichem sock suggested was the same person as myself. Further, Tweedledum and Tweedledee appears to only have an interest in one of the same subjects as Alleichem -- the proper pronunciation of the Divine Name.
SkyWriter (Tim) (
talk) 13:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Also, just today, IP 143.53.25.116 (from the same subnet as the previously banned sock IPs),
added Kght to the Wikiproject Judaism members. Kght is Knighthood, and is using the same IP subnet as the previous banned socks.
SkyWriter (Tim) (
talk) 14:14, 6 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Completed I have completed this request, but since this is my first check, I'm going to be comparing my results with another CheckUser in a few hours. I'll update the page when I confirm my findings. Nishkid64(
Make articles, not wikidrama) 18:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: All confirmed named accounts indef blocked & tagged, the IP has been softblocked for one month.
Tiptoetytalk 21:25, 6 October 2008 (UTC)reply
72.3454.34TT (
talk·contribs) This user immediately restored an edit from the Alleichem sock which was deleted by consensus
[1] under the pretext of restoring consensus. When I asked LisaLiel to help me find the origin for this IP, this new user had apparently already added her to his watchlist (unlikely for a random user), and in fact this user added the same barnstar of dilligence to his user page that I had given LisaLiel for her work in helping to identify the Alleichem sock. The combination of selecting to restore an Alleichem edit, to watch LisaLiel's page, and to add to himself the same barnstar awarded to LisaLiel for helping to catch the last sock -- stretch credibility for this to be a new user.
SkyWriter (Tim) (
talk) 16:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Additionally -- the new user apparently had this page on his watchlist and deleted the evidence against him before I could contact him about the checkuser
[2].
SkyWriter (Tim) (
talk) 16:26, 29 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Alleichem (
talk·contribs) has resumed the previous pattern of Davidamos/Mod objective/La Bible/Knighthood, with similarly tendentious reverts on the same articles from the same POV, same timezone, same language being used -- and I've compared the IP addresses to the ones cited for Davidamos (all are from England).
SkyWriter (Tim) (
talk) 17:06, 25 September 2008 (UTC)reply
It seems clear that David Amos is abusing Wikipedia to further a personal agenda. The question is how to stop him without banning everyone who works at the same company. -
LisaLiel (
talk) 17:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)reply
Confirmed that Alleichem is Mod objective.
Sam Korn(smoddy) 18:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC)reply
LaBible (
talk·contribs) appeared
[3] immediately after
Mod objective (
talk·contribs) had been warned (
User talk:Mod objective#Yahweh lead), and then reported
[4] for
WP:3RR. Mod objective has since been blocked
[5] for 31 hours. User:LaBible's edit is another revert exactly the same as Mod objective was blocked for, and the edit summary, citing
WP:IAP (sic), appears to be a direct continuation of Mod objective's claim that his behaviour was justified by
WP:IAR.
In the last five days the other accounts have also (exclusively) made edits with substantially the same agenda. If not the same user, they appear to members of the same fringe group.
Jheald (
talk) 12:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Confirmed that Mod objective, LaBible and Davidamos are one user. No comment on the IPs.
Sam Korn(smoddy) 14:10, 27 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Clerk note: LaBible and Davidamos blocked indefniitely, Mod objective's block extended to 2 weeks. Will extend to indef if Mod uses accounts abusively in the future. Nishkid64(
Make articles, not wikidrama) 15:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Knighthood (
talk·contribs) has just appeared. His first 4 edits continue the previous pattern of Davidamos/Mod objective/La Bible, with similarly tendentious reverts on the same articles from the same POV, same timezone, same language being used ("messy" lead, etc), and an odd 'taking up the baton' post on Mod objective's talk page.
Jheald (
talk) 11:09, 29 August 2008 (UTC)reply
Highly Likely -
Alison❤ 18:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it. Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.