The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that was not accepted. Please do not modify it.

Lord Voldemort

Final (0/0/0) ended 20:25, 17 January 2006, original end time 18:22 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Lord Voldemort ( talk · contribs) – Lord Voldemort has been a Wikipedian since June, 2005, and has just garnered his 4000th edit. He has been nominated for adminship once before, in October, 2005: I actually opposed the Dark Lord's first Request for Adminship, and have come to regret that decision. As I have since learned, LV is a calm, judicious, widely-admired user who could make good use of the administrator's tools. His talk page gives good evidence that many Wikipedians assume he is already an admin., as he is often requested to perform janitorial functions. I believe it is time to allow him (or burden him, as the case may be) with the duty to attend to these oh-so-fun cleanup tasks. Wikipedia will be a better place with an empowered Dark Lord to see to its safety! Xoloz 18:22, 13 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Well, Xoloz, probably no one but the two of us will ever see this, but I feel it appropriate to formally decline anyways. I would like to be an Admin, someday, just not today, I fear. At this point in time, Admin tools would not help the way I'm feeling towards Wikipedia (I could explain, but maybe not on the wiki). There are various issues I have, and must decline this nomination at this time. I sincerely appreciate your kind words and attitude. I will try and continue my good effort, but feel it dishonest to you to keep this nomination open while I try and figure things out. I wouldn't want your opinion to change, but can't guarantee that I won't do something to make you change your mind. Perhaps wait until February? If I still suit your tastes in Admins, I might be more eager to go through the RfA process. I am truly sorry. -- LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 20:25, 17 January 2006 (UTC) reply

I've seen it too :)... LV is interested, but not yet (according to the message he left on my talk page - I offered to nominate him a while back, and LV suggested me possible doing the same in about a month's time) Grutness... wha? 04:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Blasted! The secret's out. -- LV ^{(Dark Mark)} 04:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC) reply

Support

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.

A.

2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?

A.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.