Final (62/0/0) Ended 22:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
EVula ( talk · contribs) - I think he is a good editor in general, who has made 3000 edits (or more, i don't know exactly since kate's wanabee tool isn't working) since his registration occurred in December 2005. He has been more active in the last few months, and given the mainspace/talk ratio i think he could be a fairly good admin. I have seen him revert a fair amount of vandalism (especially on Star Wars related articles, which i usually edit), and checks facts quite often [1] even when they are written by a fairly experienced editor. If he accepts the nomination, i will give him a support vote. Raffaello9 Talk 20:56, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Just a note: also of interest may be my editor review. I'll answer the questions here, sure, but additional reading/telling information can be found there. EVula 22:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Optional question from (aeropagitica):
Optional questions from Malber ( talk · contribs)
EVula's editcount summary stats as of 23:33 October 31st 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 23:36, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral