This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 3, 2024.
Being Human (North American TV series and etc.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 23:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
This is the set of articles ranging from titles starting B-L, with the following traits: All of these have received zero pageviews in the last month, all of which have errors in the act of disambiguation, and all of these have been checked and confirmed to either have an associated corrected title/redirect in existence, or contain an unsalvageable error in this way. Utopes(talk / cont) 19:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
(re:Lexington station), Nice error on my part. Delete and go. Mitch32(
it's youI like.) 20:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
(re:Lost), an error on my part too. Delete all – these are probably all just typos by redirect creators. —
BarrelProof (
talk) 20:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete all. The unclosed parens make me itch (and as stated above are likely just non-redirect-worthy typos. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 20:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete none of these appear to contain any useful history worth keeping and all would be deletable under the proposed new R5 criteria and note
Lost (2021 TV series has already been deleted. Crouch, Swale (
talk) 20:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete - not needed and rarely linked on articles. The Kelechi Iheanacho link fails naming conventions for multiple reasons so that's a definite delete.
Iggy (
Swan) (
Contribs) 22:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Quay, Elizabeth
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Elizabeth Quay is a place, not a person, so I don't think this {{R from sort name}} is required.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 16:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Speedily deleted as created in error. I will add "Quay" to the list of likely issues.
BD2412T 16:42, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Addendum: There is an actual
Matthew Quay, so this is not impossible as a surname, but these will be checked in advance going forward.
BD2412T 16:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Better yet, I will go ahead and create sortnames for everyone at
Quay (disambiguation)#People, and assume that any not on the list can be skipped automatically.
BD2412T 16:45, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Complex/Rational 14:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The target is now
Key, a disambiguation page. I can't find any use in enwiki of "Thekeys.ws". I suggest delete.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 14:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete. Likely non-notable pirate site; could not find any significant coverage in a Google search, let alone any reliable source. The article section in question was added by the creator of this redirect and reverted after only about five hours. Thus, it is unlikely that there will be any valid target for this redirect.
PleaseStand (
talk) 20:06, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Delete per PleaseStand's findings --
Lenticel(
talk) 04:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
England 2022 (Association football event)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - implausible redirect. Literally nobody refers to the event as "England 2022" --
ChrisTheDude (
talk) 20:24, 3 February 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment - "England 2022" is right there on the logo for the event, but at the same time searching for "England 2022" term comes up with mostly information about England's 2022 World Cup (men's) team, amongst other random things about England in 2022, so I suppose this isn't very plausible.
A7V2 (
talk) 10:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).