This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 30, 2023.
Pentium (disambiguation)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 04:49, 9 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Disambiguate this since Boron is also called "Pentium" because its element number is 5. Also, the redirect page does not redirect to the disambiguation page.
176.88.83.247 (
talk) 19:24, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Either this should be deleted or reverted to
this dab page (seemingly consisting of stuff related the now-target almost solely). The dab page had consensus to be merged (?) into the primary topic article in
this discussion. I can't find anything calling boron pentium, by the way. J947 † edits 20:00, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Is this correct? The
Systematic element name article says a name such as this is a "temporary name assigned to an unknown or recently synthesized chemical element" and is used for transuranic elements. The recommendations (
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1351/pac197951020381/html) apply to "atomic numbers greater than 100" and say these names are for 101 and above. If boron is also called pentium is there a reliable source for this name, or an extension of systematic names to cover elements 1-100?
Peter James (
talk) 16:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)reply
This was a joke on xkcd #2723. It's not used in reality.
HotdogPi 19:31, 31 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: the target is not a disambiguation page (
WP:G14).
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 11:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per above as the target is not a dab.
CycloneYoristalk! 20:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Andretti family
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
There is much more to the Andretti family than the "Andretti curse". While this does to some extent cover the family, it's not a great target in my view, but I am not sure what a better target would be. It also might be
WP:REDYESsable.
TartarTorte 18:05, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Weak retarget to just
Andretti, which has links to the curse and the different family members of the Andretti family in question. I'm not sure if what is happening with the racing Andretti family will merit a standalone article in the near/medium future but I'm open to other ideas.
Skynxnex (
talk) 19:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment What about repurposing the Andretti curse article into a broader article on the family in general? -
Presidentmantalk ·
contribs (
Talkback) 20:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Yes, I'd also support that I believe but I think it'd be a fair amount of effort to convert the article, perhaps so I'll pause on changing my vote.
Skynxnex (
talk) 19:22, 31 January 2023 (UTC)reply
retarget to
Andretti since apparently a crossspace redirect to
Category:Andretti family would give metaphysicists the vapours. It would also take less total effort to whip up a stub than to complete this discussion but maybe some other sect has nixed that solution?
jnestorius(
talk) 20:50, 31 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ~
Anachronist (
talk) 07:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned in the target, which is a disambiguation page, or any article. –
Arms & Hearts (
talk) 20:03, 15 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment this redirect was created to point to an entry at the target added by the redirect's created in 2017 which remained until it was removed by the nominator a few minutes before this nomination.
Thryduulf (
talk) 17:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete The "Furniture fitting" did not have a wikilink in the entry before it was removed. No longer mentioned. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Carpimaps (
talk •
contribs) 01:37, 17 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~
Eejit43 (
talk) 00:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 08:17, 30 January 2023 (UTC)reply
There is some overlap with
door furniture and
architectural ironmongery, but they are not synonyms. Something could probably be added to the
furniture article, where fittings are only mentioned in image captions.
Ready-to-assemble furniture doesn't say anything about this; if the suggestion to redirect there is for the other meaning of "fitting", assembly would be the usual term there (
fitted furniture is different).
Peter James (
talk) 17:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)reply
I went with this meaning of fitting: 4. anything provided as equipment, parts, supply, etc. (see
dictionary.com). Jay 💬 05:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete due to ambiguity. signed, Rosguilltalk 04:48, 9 February 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).