The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:43, 14 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned in target article. The connection is found on third-party search engines, but the connection between the redirect and the target seems like a
WP:OR /
WP:HOAX / "
Urban dictionary" connection.
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:18, 7 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete as joke redirect --
Lenticel(
talk) 00:10, 8 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete as non-notable joke
RoostTC(please ping me when replying) 12:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Cheers, I'm nominating some of these now. –
filelakeshoe (
t /
c)
🐱 11:54, 14 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete joke. Check today's page for some more. –
filelakeshoe (
t /
c)
🐱 12:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
User:JRADO
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. CSD U2. LizRead!Talk! 23:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)reply
This User page and its subpages (and
User talk:JRADO), which exist in the space of a user that does not exist, appear to have been created by
JackReynoldsADogOwner. They look like an inappropriate use of user space. I believe that they should all be deleted (or moved to the editor's actual user space, as desired) and that any links to them should be fixed to point to the actual editor's pages. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 17:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC)reply
All are eligible for
WP:U2 speedy deletion (and possibly even
WP:U5), and rightfully so per nominator, so let's get them deleted.
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Roman Catholic Concept of the Divine
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
This redirect formerly targeted
God in Catholicism prior to that article being merged into the current target last year. However, given the state of the current target article, I cannot fathom how a reader looking up this term/redirect will be satisfied and/or find what they are looking for in the target article.
Steel1943 (
talk) 22:28, 22 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Expand into an article. If merging an article on "God in Catholicism" into an article on "God in Christianity" leaves people who are looking for the "Catholic Concept of the Divine" without a good information, our encyclopedia is simply failing in its mission to be a comprehensive repository of free knowledge. — Red-tailed hawk(nest) 01:21, 23 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 23:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 00:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).