This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 1, 2022.
Bbc1
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Bbc1 is unambiguously redirecting to the protein. A discussion on the primary target or the proper title for
Bbc1 (disambiguation) can be had at that talk page. Jay(talk) 09:08, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Honestly, i think the target article of "Bbc1" (only B in uppercase) as 60S ribosomal protein L13 feels inaccurate due to all internet search typed to "Bbc1" saw nearly all of the results unrelated to the protein. This redirect should be deleted, or retargeted to correct article.
180.254.169.147 (
talk) 23:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget, per nom,
BBC1 is far more notable, can create
Bbc1 (protein) as a redirect to replace it
Indagate (
talk) 11:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per Paradoctor and
WP:DIFFCAPS; everything at the dab page is written in capitals, where as this is the sole non-capitalised usage. Correct capitalisation should take priority over miscapitalisation.
61.239.39.90 (
talk) 21:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
DABify. I could reasonably see someone typing in "Bbc1" and looking for the channel just as much as I could see them looking for the protein. Rather than having to hatnote the page about the protein to a page on
BBC One (or vice-versa, which would be significantly odder), it makes sense to dabify when there is no primary topic. —
Mhawk10 (
talk) 22:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget unless clearly disambiguatedBBC One is clear primary redirect, regardless of miscapitalisation or not. It then can created
Bbc1 (protein) as redirect replacement. Another option would be DABify in case of no primary topic.
202.67.42.39 (
talk) 12:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per
WP:DIFFCAPS: having different targets for
bbc1 and
BBC1 is perfectly fine. It might be worth discussing the best title for
bbc1 (disambiguation), but that's a conversation for another place. -
Eureka Lott 13:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep per Eureka Lott. A
WP:RM discussion could consider whether there is no primary topic for the lowercase (i.e., consider moving the
Bbc1 (disambiguation) to
Bbc1).
Mdewman6 (
talk) 01:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep. There's already a hatnote at the current target which solves the ambiguity that this redirect may cause.
CycloneYoristalk! 06:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
This redirects to a section of a disambiguation page that does not even mention the subject; nor does it explain why it redirects to that section. I would much rather have a separate article about this subject to explain its usage in science, than have a confusing redirect to an abbreviation that explains nothing.
Renerpho (
talk) 21:28, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and Paradoctor, could make way for an article if it has a meaning beyond a phrase, otherwise could fall into
WP:NOTDICT.
Bonoahx (
talk) 21:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
London Energy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator as incorrect rationale.
(non-admin closure)Bonoahx (
talk) 00:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect not mentioned on target page, could potentially refer to
London Electricity Board which was bought by EDF but unclear. Suggesting either a retarget to
North London Waste Authority, which runs a company called LondonEnergy, or
London Power, which is a gas and electricity provider.
Bonoahx (
talk) 21:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, mention at target. Looks like this was an actual entity until being absorbed into EDF in 2006, when the redirect was created.
LondonEnergy is something different, and I think we can have both redirects differentiated by
WP:SMALLDETAILS as long as the version with the space is mentioned at the target. Retargeting to closely named but different entities is likely to just create confusion.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 23:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Also, if kept, {{distinguish}} hatnotes would be helpful on both the EDF and North London Waste Authority pages.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 23:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
I don't know why I didn't check the company name, you're right, there was a London Energy plc that changed it's name to EDF in 2006. Will speedy keep this RfD and edit the article myself.
Bonoahx (
talk) 00:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:47, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned in target article. In addition, the title hints that an article or redirect named
Wandlore exists, and it doesn't.
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: The redirect is fully-protected; at this moment, there is no RFD tag on the redirect.
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete (once deprotected and tagged for RfD for the requisite 7 days). This was
brought to AfD where the close was to delete the page, but instead there was an attempt at a soft redirect to the harry potter wiki, which at some point became a mainspace redirect. Since the redirect is inappropriate and there was past consensus to delete the page, follow through with past consensus.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 20:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete or G6 it. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 03:51, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
OBHWF
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
I discovered why this redirects here, but am unsure its utility. Apparently, the acronym stands for "One Big Happy Weasley Family", but it seems like non-canon term made-up by fans. Due to this, I'm not certain if this redirect helps in its utility by existing, especially to the lack of the mention of the acronym or the acronym's meaning in the article.
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete I can't remember why I created this anyway.
Marnanel (
talk) 17:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned in target article. Third party search results for this term are split between fans of the
Harry Potter series and various other subjects completely unrelated to the Harry Potter series.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, not at all a common search term. —El Millo (
talk) 17:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
No such term on the target, unable to find more suitable target. Presently no assistance to navigation.
Richhoncho (
talk) 15:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: misleading.
Veverve (
talk) 15:39, 13 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: Molinos en ritmo was the 4-track sampler (EP) of the album, see e.g.
here. The ideal target would be
Bebo Valdés discography, which does not exist yet.
Neodop (
talk) 19:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Neodop. If you wish to add that information to the album article I am happy to withdraw the nomination, but to redirect a reader to a page where there is no relevant information, is not assistance to navigation, but a blind alley. --
Richhoncho (
talk) 20:47, 14 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 22:25, 20 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Neodop was not pinged properly above. @
Neodop: doing it now. Jay(talk) 07:49, 28 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay(talk) 17:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. OP withdraws nomination.(
non-admin closure)
Mdewman6 (
talk) 23:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Speedykeep Opps, I found one on [
[1]].Sorry.
Pavlov2 (
talk) 16:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I really don't know why Mersenne safe prime needs to be redirected to 7 instead of Mersenne prime.
Pavlov2 (
talk) 13:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Refine target to
7#Mersenne safe prime The article states that 7 is the only Mersenne number that is a
safe prime. I added an anchor so we can save readers the burden of hitting CTRL-F. Paradoctor (
talk) 13:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Thanks a lot. Solved.
Pavlov2 (
talk) 13:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Luca Schreiner
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The page was first redirected to
Only Love (Shaggy song) initially, then changed to
Saturday Sun (Vance Joy song). Neither of these pages offer any information about the target Luca Schreiner. At this point, as none of those pages offer any further information about the subject substantial information other than a mention of a remix he produced, the redirect does not serve a proper purpose especially as there are multiple targets where the page could be redirected to. ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 12:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete as impeding search. There are about two dozen mentions of various remixes by German DJ Luca Schreiner on Wikipedia. There may be a bio article in the future, but not yet.
Neither of these pages offer any information about the target That is false. Both articles mention a remix version of their subject by Schreiner. Paradoctor (
talk) 12:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Paradoctor allow me to rephrase that, neither target offered substantial information other than a mention of a remix he produced this no obvious target for the redirect. ≫
Lil-Unique1-{
Talk }- 13:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Contratista
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 12:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Spanish for "contractor". Not relevant to any of the entries at the current target. There is a 2018 Mexican film El Contratista, but it is not mentioned anywhere on Wikipedia. Paradoctor (
talk) 11:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:RDELETE #8: In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created.—
Bagumba (
talk) 07:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The word "censorship" is nowhere in the target article, leaving it unclear what this redirect is supposed to refer.
Steel1943 (
talk) 06:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
This was an article from 2003 to 2006 (
final version). Religious debates over the Harry Potter series discusses the same topic, mentioning at least four events from the list, and most if not all censorship of Harry Potter has been on religious grounds, so I support a retarget there. If there's no consensus for a new target, this should be restored and sent to AfD, as its content pre-redirection was neither speedyable nor SNOWable. (Sidenote, I've un-redirected the talkpage, which contains some discussion and a note from the BLARing editor.) --
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they) 07:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
April Fools isn't here yet, or has passed! Please do not start pranking until April 1 (UTC time). If it is April 1 (UTC), then please
purge the page and this notice will disappear and you can enjoy April 1. Please do not remove this notice, even on April Fools.
The beginning of April Fools Day 2022 has started. (
refresh)
Template:Condom
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Support, this may be the best idea I have read on this website.
BD2412T 16:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Uranus
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hoax (song)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
WP:AN/I
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
While I am too inexperienced an editor to understand exactly what the proper uses of these "User talk:" pages are, I trust the community will know how best they could be put to use if they were made more easily and memorably accessible by being given short and consistent shortcuts. Accordingly, I propose that
User talk:Iridescent be assigned the redirect
WP:AN/I. While this redirect does appear to be in use already, it is only for
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, so changing it should not inconvenience many editors; the small number of editors who want to visit that page will still be able to use the shortcut
WP:ANI, which is shorter than
WP:AN/I anyway.4-1
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Recursion
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was {{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|{{subst:rfd top|...}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}.
(non-admin closure)--
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they) 00:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The article is not a sufficient example of recursion. This should be corrected immediately. Ten Pound Hammer • (
What did I screw up now?) 01:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Buzz Lightyear since the character stated "To infinity and beyond!"
Steel1943 (
talk) 19:57, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Recursion (disambiguation), because 1) disambiguation pages that have "disambiguation" in the title are fun, 2) we shouldn't assume what the user is looking for, and 3) there is a nice example of actual recursion already in the "see also" section of that article.
Renerpho (
talk) 21:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Declaration of war on CfD
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
I am concerned that it difficult to tell from the proposed target whether that cat is indeed small.
BD2412T 16:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
@
BD2412: You're welcome to find a smaller cat, but I suspect category-editor sabotage. --
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they) 23:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
WP:TNT
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was TNT this whole entire RfD about TNT, and ping
TNT for some added TNT.
(non-admin closure) —
3PPYB6 —
TALK —
CONTRIBS — 01:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Very confusing redirect. Someone mentioned this shortcut at AfD and I thought "What's
TheresNoTime got to do anything? Did she !vote here or something?" Apparently it's also the name of an essay or something. Weird. User:TheresNoTime's userpage gets 17 times the pageviews as the current target, and has almost as many backlinks, so clearly she's the primary topic and we should retarget. (Note:
WP:TNTTNT will then have to be speedily deleted
G10 as a death threat.) --
Tamzincetacean needed (she/they) 00:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Hammer time
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Filing on behalf of a third party, to stop hammer time.
DMacks (
talk) 14:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.