This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 21, 2020.
Wikkkipedia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. There's a consensus for deletion. Noting CoffeeWithMarkets's comment that some of these terms do have particular prominence, there is no prejudice against recreation of these redirects pointing to more appropriate targets than a general article about satirical misspellings. signed, Rosguilltalk 23:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Example not used in target article. Was part of a
WP:TRAINWRECK bundled nom in 2010 that ended in no consensus, but the examples not included in the article are probably good for deletion. I'll be adding more as I go along, but I'll try and avoid the trainwreck issue from the previous nomination. The link to the 2010 nom is
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 November 19#$ony. These are all not mentioned in the article, there are other such redirects, but didn't want to make the nom too big or TRAINWRECK issues might happen again with this one.
Hog Farm (
talk) 22:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all these just clog things up.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 23:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all, this is Urban Dikkktionary stuff; and writing 'k' as '
kkk' isn't exactly satiric.
Narky Blert (
talk) 05:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment - Most of these appear to be empty insults without notability and can be just deleted. I'm seeing a few exceptions, though. "KKKatholic" reflects criticism of the Catholic Church as an organization for being insufficiently active in rooting out racism from certain pulpits, particularly when it comes to some American firebrands who defended Jim Crow and used KKK talking points (despite the KKK then and now being anti-Catholic to its core). "KKKlinton" reflects criticism of Bill and Hillary Clinton for their statements about and policies toward racial tension, particularly their historical advocacy for mass incarceration seen (rightly or wrongly) as ethnically biased. "KKKramer" refers, naturally enough, to comedian Michael Richards' bizarre n-word incident and unusual later actions. Otherwise, though, I'd delete these.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 09:46, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete all as obvious insults.
JIP |
Talk 23:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wong Tsz Ho (footballer, born 1996)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 07:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
1996 seems to be incorrect based on the article content. I would suggest deletion unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 20:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - it's unnecessary, as "Wong Tsz Ho" alone brings up the article. --
Woofboy (
talk) 22:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The point of this nomination is that the subject's article states that they are born in 1994, not 1996. The redirect
Wong Tsz Ho (footballer, born 1996) also exists, but since the birth year in that redirect matches the birth year in the article, the aforementioned redirect is an appropriate {{R from unnecessary disambiguation}}.
Steel1943 (
talk) 01:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom since the birth year is inaccurate.
Steel1943 (
talk) 01:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - Redirects don't have to be strictly accurate, but this is misleading and unhelpful. There's no reason to keep it.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 09:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 13:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - serves no purpose.
GiantSnowman 13:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Bethany Joanna Perske
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·C) 07:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Bacall was born "Betty Joan Perske", no indication that she was ever known as Bethany Joanna. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguilltalk 19:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete unless a source is provided; if none can, it is 100%
WP:OR.
Betty can be a shortened version of at least Beatrice, Bethia and Elizabeth, and also a given name in its own right.
Narky Blert (
talk) 20:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
I'm not sure why someone would search for Epic Mickey using this format (other than getting the words backwards), and strangely we don't have
Mickey Epic. While "Micky" is a plausible misspelling for "Mickey" (per
Micky Mouse), I'm tilting towards delete on these two. Regards,
SONIC678 18:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete both - Neither of these seem particularly worth keeping to me either.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 09:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Nick Bianco
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
This redirect was formerly a 2-entry disambiguation page but one entry was deleted and the page redirected. However, whilst the article
Nicholas Bianco says that the subject was known as "Nicky", it doesn't say he was known as "Nick".
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 09:42, 14 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The Final World War
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per
WP:CRYSTAL, there's currently no way of knowing if World War III will be the final World War. Regards,
SONIC678 18:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete – there could be a World War IV, and it may be fought with
sticks and stones, but this redirect has no clear, reliably sourced, or correct target in any case.
ComplexRational (
talk) 19:47, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - ambiguous. We don't know how many world wars there will be, and other potential targets like
Armageddon#Dispensationalism don't hold an exclusive hold on the phrase.
Hog Farm (
talk) 22:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete as unverifiably speculative. Even if
world peace is declared at some point, we don't know for certain that yet another world war will never happen. Best to let the world end before creating redirects like this.
Glades12 (
talk) 07:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - This is all too vague and uncertain. I agree.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 09:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete. The target article does not disambiguate the term "decriminalization of marijuana" (which is not ambiguous), it is an article about the decriminalization of marijuana.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 15:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
I have speedy deleted this, as should have been done when the dab page was converted to a redirect last year.
BD2412T 16:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Alethea Talbot, Countess of Shrewsbury
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Alethea Talbot was a daughter of an Earl and Countess of Shrewsbury. She married an Earl of Arundel and so became Countess of Arundel, but she could never have been Countess Of Shrewsbury.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 15:43, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. My researches agree with nom's; this looks like a mistake. It may have occurred because some of her father's subsidiary titles (but not the earldom) passed to her after his death; see the succession boxes in
Gilbert Talbot, 7th Earl of Shrewsbury.
Narky Blert (
talk) 16:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Nathan Heywood (Arrowverse)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
His real name is Nathaniel Heywood, and "Nathan" is never mentioned in the series; instead it's Nate. Kailash29792(talk) 07:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. No issue with this. --
Gonnym (
talk) 09:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Agreed. Generally, redirects should be moved only when there is useful edit history at the title, which the nominated redirect does not have.
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete. All of the redirects I suggested to rename it to already exist.
OcelotCreeper (
talk) 23:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Southern Reich
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
This doesn't look like a term used for New Swabia. I did a search for "Southern Reich", and it looks like it mainly referred to the Southern areas controlled by Nazi Germany in World War II. Here's a few examples I found with geographic markers: missions in the southern Reich and Hungary ... Up the Danube; To the Southern Reich ... Salzburg, Austria, a collecting point for Luftwaffe units in the Southern Reich ... up the Italian 'Boot' into the southern Reich. --
Tavix(
talk) 02:55, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - Both "Southern" and "Reich" are rather ambiguous in this context. It seems best to simply let people use the search engine.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 09:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Evangelista,Rey
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Axles on roler coasters
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 21:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Surprisingly enough, the target article does not mention axles. Not quite as surprising, but I found it interesting that
Dk36870 spelled "roller" incorrectly twice while creating a short article: The toller costers axles keep the wheels intact with the ride. Without them we would be riding on metal strips that screech. --
Tavix(
talk) 01:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - I also don't think that this is useful.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 12:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Dellete. Impllausiblle mispeling. Also - not mentioned in the target and therefore completely useless.
Narky Blert (
talk) 22:32, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
File:Ffviiremake.png
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep per
WP:FILERED. An image existed at this title for a few years before it was moved. Deletion would only perhaps be appropriate if the move occured shortly after creation. —
Godsy (
TALKCONT) 04:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Keep - I agree. It would be one thing if the previous title was totally incorrect or otherwise misleading, but that's not true in this case. I don't see a particular reason that we have to get rid of the redirect.
CoffeeWithMarkets (
talk) 09:26, 22 March 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.