This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 6, 2017.
C7BK
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted,
R3. --
Tavix(
talk) 14:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)reply
No evidence that these are valid abbreviations.
Steel1943 (
talk) 22:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete recently created and implausible. As abbreviations of "chapter 7/13 bankruptcy", these are totally unattested in reliable sources. Even in the few unreliable sources where these abbreviations are found (webforums, blogs, and such), there's almost always a space before "BK".
59.149.124.29 (
talk) 03:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete implausible
Cabayi (
talk) 10:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as implausible. These do not follow any standard convention (at least that I am aware of) for abbreviating the U.S. Code. Also, FYI, these were created by a user (
C7BK) whose page reads (in its entirety) "I am a Wikipedia vandal." --
Notecardforfree (
talk) 14:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pure vandalism
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 14:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete due to the target not explaining what the "pure" means and how it is exclusive from the subject of the target article.
Steel1943 (
talk) 22:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete - About the same as if I redirected "good pizza" to "pizza". Not encyclopedic.ZXCVBNM (
TALK) 02:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Death of Jeffrey Miller
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep And how many of them are world-famous because of the manner in which they died? —
Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk 03:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The ability of that question's answer to affect this redirect is questionable, given that the redirect is ambiguous. Also, I skimmed through a few of the
pages in the "article" namespace starting with "Death of", and I am currently unable to find a title where the subject that comes after "Death of" is ambiguous.
Steel1943 (
talk) 03:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)reply
That's just not true. Surely more than one person named Diana has died, yet we have
Death of Diana. —
MShabazzTalk/Stalk 15:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Okay... my use of "...a few..." shows that I did not claim that I was 100% sure I was correct. In fact, that example is probably one of the few (if not the only) exceptions.
Steel1943 (
talk) 20:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep. Looking over the
Jeffrey Miller disambiguation page, only one other non-living person is there:
J. C. P. Miller. His article does not mention his death, leading me to assume that his death is in no way remarkable. Nor is "Jeffrey Miller" his common name, so it's exceedingly unlikely someone would use "Death of Jeffrey Miller" for this person. The Kent State victim, however, is definitely notable for his death so the redirect to his article is appropriate. --
Tavix(
talk) 14:03, 6 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
Tavix(
talk) 14:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Retired music artist. No other notability can be established at this time.
jd22292(
Jalen D. Folf) (
talk) 17:20, 24 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Keep or retarget to
RemedySounds. Notability doesn't matter for redirects. — Zawl 17:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete non-notable artist, and not to be confused with RemedySounds. The single on the album is not individually charted to be notable, and there are a bunch of other non-notable featured artists like King Deco and Joni Fatora, none of which meet
WP:MUSICBIO It would be different if he was the main producer of that album and that was his biggest claim to fame.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 15:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Tavix(
talk) 01:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.