30 July
The nominated redirect was
delete. -
Mailer Dia
b
lo 16:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely search term and unnecessary, search box is case-insensitive.
Schzmo 23:33, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom It's very unlikely that someone would type wikipedia like that. --
Edgelord 05:30, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, this post-dates the use of CamelCase on Wikipedia by a very long time, which I would think would be the only possible justification for keeping it. --
Cyde↔Weys 05:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- DeLeTe. --
Oden 23:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
- dElEtE.
Chaos syndrome 14:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. —
freak(
talk) 14:05, Aug. 1, 2006 (UTC)
Redirect left over from moving a talk archive out of the main article namespace.
Gavia immer 19:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Deleted --
Cyde↔Weys 14:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Malformed article name using multiple single quotes.
Gavia immer 17:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Who'd actually use this redirect anyway?
Thisthema
n 20:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Deleted --
Cyde↔Weys 14:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Malformed article name using multiple single quotes.
Gavia immer 17:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Who'd actually use this redirect anyway?
Thisthema
n 20:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Deleted --
Cyde↔Weys 14:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Malformed article name using multiple single quotes.
Gavia immer 17:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Who'd actually use this redirect anyway?
Thisthema
n 20:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Deleted --
Cyde↔Weys 14:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Malformed article name using multiple single quotes.
Gavia immer 17:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Who'd actually use this redirect anyway?
Thisthema
n 20:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Deleted --
Cyde↔Weys 14:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Malformed article name using multiple single quotes.
Gavia immer 17:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Who'd actually use this redirect anyway?
Thisthema
n 20:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Deleted --
Cyde↔Weys 14:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Malformed article name using multiple single quotes.
Gavia immer 17:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Who'd actually use this redirect anyway?
Thisthema
n 20:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Deleted. --
JLaTondre 00:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
No content in the
Wal-Mart or SuperValue articles to support that this entity exists —
C.Fred (
talk) 16:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was redirected to
Three Dollar Bill, which seems to be about a band. —
freak(
talk) 14:07, Aug. 1, 2006 (UTC)
What evidence is there that the phrase "three-dollar bill" actually relates to homosexuality? I would have expected to see an article about the phrase "phony as a three-dollar bill," why $3 is an inconvenient denomination for currency, and whether $3 bills have ever actually existed.
Neon
Merlin 15:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- This would be a reference to the phrase "queer as a three dollar bill". However, three dollar bill has enough other uses that I don't think this is an appropriate redirect. I suggest re-targeting to
Three Dollar Bill until there is an actual article. --
JLaTondre 16:12, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Keep and fix the redirect per
JLaTondre; it makes the most sense. Can disambig later.
Thisthema
n 20:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
delete. -
Mailer Dia
b
lo 16:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Far too broad a term to redirect to one local government in Ontario, Canada; odds that anyone already confused enough to search for 'regional decisions' would be helped by a page on Peel Region are beyond minuscule
Gary Will 14:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete --
Renesis13 17:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Oz
Lawyer
- Delete or redirect to something useful like
Administrative division. --
Oden 23:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Deleted (CSD R1). --
JLaTondre 13:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete-Currently redirects to a nonexistent page, and the page title isn't capitalised correctly-
ROFLcopter
Talk to ROFLcopter, kthx 11:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Kept and tagged {{
R from misspelling}}. --
JLaTondre 00:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Vandal moves original page around, attempted to speedy twice but told it was a "plausible" misspelling. It's simply a vandal joke and no one, unless someone screws up spelling that badly and specifically, would ever reach this page..
Lid 04:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete I don't believe that this redirect will be useful. --
Edgelord 05:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Weak Keep It is close to his ring name and Jerry Lawler and Brian Christopher called him this name often (Taco) in various 1997 RAW broadcasts. --
Quotes22 06:52, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as plausible misspelling of alternate name mentioned in first paragraph of article. Aids searching.
BigNate37
(T) 21:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Deleted. Unlikely misspelling given both names wrong. --
JLaTondre 00:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
See above.
Lid 04:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as plausible misspelling of alternate name mentioned in first paragraph of article. Aids searching.
BigNate37
(T) 21:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
Kept (nomination withdrawn) and tagged with
{{
R from plural}}. --
JLaTondre 13:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete - This is currently redirecting to a DAB page that is undergoing Disambiguation link repair. I don't believe that it is appropriate to change the redirect to any one of the dabs either.
Brian G 04:16, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy keep - This is an invalid deletion reason, we don't delete plurals of really common words like this. So what if the target page has problems, that doesn't have anything to do with the redirect. --
Cyde↔Weys 06:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- I agree. It's a plasuable misspelling.
Edgelord 07:30, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- OK, sorry. I didn't think that we redirected to DAB pages. If I am incorrect, please consider this nomination withdrawn. --
Brian G 12:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was
delete. -
Mailer Dia
b
lo 16:44, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
Why does this exist? Who is going to go looking for a list of list of wikis? I see no reason to keep this around
Lurker
talk 14:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. A list of list of wikis? What in the world? It just makes no sense, unless someone spazzed in some way.
Thisthema
n 20:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Pure crap. --
Quotes22 08:07, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. The redirect looks like it began as linkspam, and should've been deleted. Nothing useful links there anyway. --
Oden 23:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.