Result of failed attempt at a redirect move, can probably be speedied KleenupKrew 13:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Hany Ramzy actor shouldn't redirect to Hany Ramzy footballer. Zoz (t) 10:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The redirect page mispells the name. The mispelling is unlikely to be used by regular users. HYC 09:46, 1 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Admittedly a joke. Zoz (t) 09:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Misspelled original name, will never be searched on (cross-namespace?) Fram 12:36, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-space redirect, only one use. — Shayl talk 22:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC) reply
"Wayne Rumney" turns up a total of 9 google hits, 7 of which are mirrors of the Rooney article from wiki probably based on the redirect. The word "Rumney" is not mentioned in the Rooney article, and the redirect is not used by any other page. Gimmetrow 19:54, 2 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.This article was deleted, and it has now been set up to redirect to a category. I was under the impressions that article namespace should not redirect to categories. If this is to go, there are many others of a similar format for different channel numbers. I'm not sure how to list them all at once. GassyGuy 07:10, 2 July 2006 (UTC) reply
If "Disney'" is entered in the search bar, It's probably a typo and they are probably looking for the The Walt Disney Company article or something. So, delete. A c1983fan ( talk • contribs) 14:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a cross-space redirect out of article space into user space. Takeel 21:28, 2 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Cross namespace redirect. Gimmetrow 23:19, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect, and also very unlikely search term (borderline CSD R3) (does not contain any notable history, it's used to be a redirect to the historic Wikipedia utilities/Page titles to be deleted (which would need to be kept, and is fascinating reading!) Regards, MartinRe 23:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
I'd rather not delete this redirect because it is a cross-article namespace, but would like to see what other users think of this. Iola k ana| T 20:11, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The redirect goes to The Silencers the movie instead of The Silencers (band). Maybe there's a redirect from "The Silencers (band)" to "The Silencers" that needs to be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessesamuel ( talk • contribs)
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Do we really want redirects from specific dates in specific years? I mean, we have these but we don't have July 1, 2006, July 2, 2006, July 23, 2006 etc. Why then do we have these? Either we should delete these, or have some bot create all the redirects. Helicoptor 15:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Subject deserves its own separate article. -- Dissident ( Talk) 14:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Cross-namespace redirect created by a move (by me) on notability and self-reference grounds. I'm not blamming it myself because that would amount to unilateral speedy deletion of a mainspace article. The redirect is only in articlespace use once (on OS-tan), where I suggest to simply unlink the word, and the two other links to it should be diverted to the new location. -- grm_wnr Esc 14:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.There is no Reverend Edward Nelson that I can find. Superwad 04:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC) reply
There is no Edward Nelson who is a priest that I can find Superwad 04:19, 5 July 2006 (UTC) reply
unlikely search term, may cause confusion Jay32183 17:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The proposition "of" presumes that there were books that went missing from the Jewish canon. Not only is this factually incorrect, it also asserts a POV, namely that any works did get lost. See Talk:Lost books of the Old Testament for a detailed reasoning. Dr Zak 15:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Crystal Analysis is an OLAP tool, whilst crystal anaylsis is a description of Crystallography Ratarsed 12:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Pretty obvious bad redirect. -- SPUI ( T - C) 09:43, 4 July 2006 (UTC) reply
KDTP redirects to KTAZ, but should not, as KDTP is a separate station. -- dhett 08:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Double redirect to Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, plus cross-namespace. -- ADNghiem501 06:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect. -- ADNghiem501 06:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC) reply
STS-51-L was originally a redirect, but following a desicion to split the
Challenger Disaster article, it has become a full article. The talk page is a redirect however, and should be deleted so users can discuss the new article. --GW_Simulations
|User Page |
Talk |
Contribs |
E-mail 19:13, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
Some sort of a fork. Not clear if useful. Also Surprise Royals - CrazyRussian talk/ email 14:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The redirect should be deleted because it was created after the template was moved, and is no longer used. Hintha 22:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.I merged and redirected Patch (emo) a couple of days ago. Now I find out it was a neologism, created by the author of the article. Since it isn't a real term, delete -- Chuq 07:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Cross-namespace redirect created when moving a transclusion page improperly created in the Template namespace. Northenglish ( talk) -- 19:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply
"al-Masri" could equally well apply to Abu Ayyub al-Masri, and "Masri" could equally well apply to either man or the Egyptian arabic language. Can we delete the redirects and do a disambiguation page that includes all three? Jessesamuel 18:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Malformed article name. Redirects that don't say Mazda twice already exist. Page has long since moved. 198.103.172.9 17:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Malformed article name. Redirects that don't say Mazda twice already exist. Page has long since moved. 198.103.172.9 17:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Malformed article name. Redirects that don't say Mazda twice already exist. Page has long since moved. 198.103.172.9 17:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Malformed article name. Redirects that don't say Mazda twice already exist. Page has long since moved. 198.103.172.9 17:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Malformed article name. Page has long since moved. 198.103.172.9 17:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Patent nonsense -- created as the result of a page move of Mongolia by a vandal. Zonath 08:32, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.This article survived two AfDs in march and april Then it was moved in June. The resulting redirect is now cross namespace, and particularly odd as a subarticle. I thought subarticles were not allowed in the main namespace? Gimmetrow 23:24, 5 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect created when article was userfied — C.Fred ( talk) 14:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.The redirect is redundant. Morgan (comics) redirects to Morgaine (disambiguation), which includes several non-comics links, plus two comics links, Morgaine le Fey (DC Comics) and Morgan le Fay (Marvel Comics). I have fixed all the former links to Morgan (comics) to point to the correct version of the character, so the Morgan (comics) redirect is no longer necessary. TheronJ 14:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC) reply
List was cut-pasted from main article to a subarticle because article was getting long. Then the subarticle was moved to regular article space "per style guide" No reason the redirect should remain, nothing links to the redirect. I doubt the mover has any objection. Gimmetrow 01:49, 7 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Sophomoric personal attack; see WP:BLP. (No links, BTW) CWC (talk) 09:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross namespace redirect Polonium 18:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Another cross namespace redirect Polonium 18:21, 7 July 2006 (UTC) reply
No mention of these two items in the target article; redirect makes no sense. — C.Fred ( talk) 21:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The user who moved the article made a mistake. Dahlia Ravikovitch is the correct spelling, as can be seen in an image of one of her poem books which was translated to English. The Dahlia Ravikovitch article should be deleted, to allow a reversal of the move. -- Asbl 22:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Silly. Possibly confusing. Objectionable to anyone with common sense. Isn't there some way to get rid of this? –
RHolton
≡– 21:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
reply
New Article. Just created redirect after spotting creator had used incorrect spelling and therefore created new article with correct spelling. Richard Harvey 21:18, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Hmm... I was looking through a possible list of abbreviations I made and this looks rather odd. Seems like an attack to me. Invitatious 21:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Not specific enough; dozens of shows will do Christmas Specials. smurrayinch ester( User), ( Talk) 18:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Not useful. Destination could change with time (is it even true now?) – RHolton ≡– 16:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Pejorative, vulgar alternative name for target without notable mention in the target article. There have been cases where pejorative references are mentioned in the main article and have been upheld as notable; this is unlikely one of those cases. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 16:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross namespace redirect. L C @ R S DA T A 09:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Not that I don't think it's funny, mind... -- Vary | Talk 05:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Of no practical use, no incoming links, not a helpful redirection, monopolises an otherwise unused generic term to a specific private purpose Ex nihil 05:03, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect. -- ADNghiem501 04:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross namespace redirect. -- ADNghiem501 02:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect. -- ADNghiem501 02:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
My mistake in creating a new article. Misleading redirect to the correct title (I moved it). Redirect could probably be speedied. Invitatious 02:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused, implausable redirect. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 01:33, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Implausible typo. Invitatious 23:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Listing for deletion on behalf of Lou Sander. Reason: There is no such thing as a giant raccoon (thank god!) Artw 16:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Article-space redirect to a category that is unlikely to be used. Invitatious 15:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
{{
R to list entry}}
, could that help, considering the category as list? --
Omniplex 21:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replyInappropriate redirect - I think anti-liberal doesn't necessarily mean authoritarian Zoz (t) 14:31, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Cross namespace redirect. Zoz (t) 13:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect Zoz (t) 12:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross namespace redirect incorrectly tagged as "shortcut", we have WP:JA. (In reply to an earlier comment / question: Polluting the main namespace with "meta" data is evil, no policy, but a guideline, makes sense for various reasons). -- Omniplex 06:27, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Is it really an implausible typo? It really is in quotes. Invitatious 03:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Cross namespace redirect incorrectly tagged as "shortcut". We have WP:TM and WP:TEMP. -- Omniplex 02:56, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
68.50.203.109 04:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross namespace redirect incorrectly tagged as "shortcut". There's a new WP:FORMULA. -- Omniplex 02:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Cross namespace redirect incorrectly tagged as "shortcut". We have WP:SUBST. -- Omniplex 02:45, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross namespace redirect incorrectly tagged as "shortcut". -- Omniplex 02:38, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant cross namespace redirect, WP:NPA is shorter following a common pattern -- Omniplex 02:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.serious misspelling Tauʻolunga 23:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Target page deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Coyle. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Target page deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Coyle. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Target page deleted per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Coyle. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 02:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Cross namespace redirect Polonium 21:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC) reply
It redirects to a list of acronyms and this acronym isn't even in there or has any definition at all (I think I saw this 6 months ago and it wasn't in there, either) so I think the redir should get deleted DyslexicEditor 01:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply
A pentagram is a very specific type of five-pointed star containing interior lines and an interior pentagon. Redirecting all of the superset to this subset is confusing to readers, and editors at Pentagram are having to repeatedly revert additions of material relating to five-pointed stars (but unrelated to pentagrams). Fuzzypeg ☻ 00:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply
There have been several suggestions to redirect instead to Star polygon, however this kind of misses the point. A pentagram is both a five-pointed star and a star polygon, however a five-pointed star is neither a pentagram nor a star polygon unless it is drawn as a unicursal star, with sections of line passing through the internal part of the figure. For instance the star is neither a pentagram nor a star polygon - it is in geometric terms a concave decagon. To be a pentagram (and thereby a star polygon) it would need to look like this . My suggestion is that Five-pointed star should eventually be articleified, as the most appropriate place for stars like this. I just didn't want to articlefy it myself. Fuzzypeg ☻ 04:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
I have been bold and created Star (symbol), which I think is more useful than Five-pointed star. This could eventually be split into separate articles for five-pointed, six-pointed, etc., however I suggest we wait and see how the material organises itself in that article before we try to split it. The stub is still quite imperfect (as stubs tend to be), however I have limited time this evening... Fuzzypeg ☻ 07:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect-- Daduzi talk 16:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redirect to a cross-namespace redirect-- Daduzi talk 16:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect. Kotepho 16:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC) reply
&Delete: Its a cross namespace redirect. We keep the article space separate for a reason, and despite the attempts of a limited number of users to change this precedent, lots of these are deleted every week. -- Hetar 03:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect. -- Zoz (t) 12:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Very recent redirect with complicated name unlikely to get type-ins or accidental links; Grammatically incorrect title; Factually incorrect and potentially confusing name (it's a processed beverage, not just milk); -- Latebird 08:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redirect was initially created to address spelling error ("poliiticians") during creation of project page, redirecting to Wikipedia:WikiProject Politicial parties and politicians in Canada. Correcting the 2nd error ("Politicial") created double redirects from two pages, which have since been addressed. There are no pages linking to the nominated redirect page. -- Ckatz 05:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redirect was created during moving the page. Taqfiq is a totally wrong spelling, probably a typo. -- Wedian 04:47, 10 July 2006 (UTC) reply
"Algore" is Rush Limbaugh's purile and derogatory nickname for the former vice-president, and should not have its own page, currently a simple redirect to Al Gore. There is no purpose for this page other than as a insult against the man. It is not a misspelling, and no similer redirect exists for "Billclinton" or "Georgebush." Kitteneatkitten 03:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Haven't read this book in a while, but I don't have any memory of this, and Google doesn't seem to either: [10]. Opabinia regalis 03:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Nothing links to this one particular redirect, but the name in question is also the name of a soccer player from the Ivory Coast, and it seems wasteful to target a more specifically-named page just because of a worthless redirect. fuzzy510 03:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect Renesis13 02:18, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Bogus title created during a move war. Culture of the Communist China goes with it. SchmuckyTheCat 23:15, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Odd Girl Out links to this, because an actress in the movie has that name. If/when somebody wishes to make an article for the 1939 spelling be winner it should be at Elizabeth Ann Rice. This name should be a redlink in Odd Girl Out Rob 22:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Perhaps someone should just turn the redirect page into at least a stub page for the actress, instead of just deleting it. Teknomage 14:51, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Db-g9 is Office Actions, not page move (which is G6, which has its own redirect to a different template). Invitatious ( talk) 21:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply
1999 is much more plausible, but it's probably better to leave it out entirely, as 1899 and 2099 are also plausible. The 99 Flake article now says it's named "Flake99", so the current redirect is not totally bogus. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:04, 11 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Haiducii was never on Afd and the redirect looks like vandalism to me—Preceding unsigned comment added by SupaStarGirl ( talk • contribs)
Ilia is more likely a reference to a province in Greece. If anything it should be turned into a disambiguation page, which I may do anyway. Avi 16:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect. Recently created. No incoming links. Delete. – Gurch 16:22, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Not likely to ever be used. Brian G 14:53, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
No one will ever type this (i.e. the missing space), result of error moving an article I guess. Double redirect. Thanks/ wangi 09:39, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Nonsense. Kotepho 04:24, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Looks like a joke. The author has made some other contributions of dubious utility. 24.120.201.174 18:33, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Attempt to fix article by the preceding author which was prod'd. Actually, should be 113 BC if anywhere, but seems like a bad idea. See also -113. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 18:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC) reply
This number isn't mentioned in the googolplex article, so it shouldn't redirect there. Delete. Voortle 17:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC) reply
This newly created redirect was first pointed at George W. Bush and then changed to point at Horror. Since the word horrible does not really bear the same encyclopedic meaning as Horror (which is a disambig page) nor does it seem like a possible misspelling of horror, I don't think it should be there. BigNate37 23:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
There are 500 pages with 'Siobhan' on them, and no evidence that this person is known by their first name more than any of the others. Ziggurat 21:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
This was put here a few weeks ago, and strangely closed on June 7th with the result of "no consensus", even though there was no user who wanted to keep the redirect. As listed before, the redirect is not appropriate because Aether theories does not contain anything about Aetherometry, and the redirect lends and air of legtimacy to Aetherometry by linking to a page mostly about historical non-pseudoscientific theories. Whether there should be an article about Aetherometry has no relevance to the appropriateness of the redirect. Philosophus T 09:05, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a position where the person will change rather frequently. We cannot have redirects for every occupation, "Secretary of Agriculture", "CEO of IBM", etc. — Centrx→ talk • 07:39, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Found another one (see "Regular number" below). How many of these are there, anyway? -- Trovatore 06:03, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Changed as below. Septentrionalis 21:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.redirect based on misspelling Moioci 03:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
see nomination of Regular number, below -- Trovatore 03:33, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Changed to point differently, as below. Septentrionalis 21:27, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Finishing incomplete nomination by User:CASE, with no reason given.
Finishing incomplete nomination by User:Sarefo, with no reason given. Araniella is a genus in the family Araneidae and the order Araneae. Retarget to List of Araneidae species, which has a section for Araniella. TimBentley (talk) 02:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.The article regular number was just deleted at AfD, on the grounds that the phrase has no standard meaning. Thus there is no intelligible reason for it to point to decimal, or anywhere else. -- Trovatore 01:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
There isn't a CSD G10, so it's a pretty unlikely typo. The reason given in the template is CSD A6/I8. -- ais523 12:02, 13 July 2006 ( U T C)
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Highly offensive redirect, presumably created as an attack. Delete. bikeable (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
My user page, User:Yassie has been encountered move vandal by User:Gongbu migok. This redirect page was "created" when I moved it back to revert vandalism. Yassie 14:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Redirects to wrong person (William Ellsworth Hoy); vestige of someone creating article without realizing they had the name wrong. MisfitToys 23:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC) reply
I don't see why it redirects there PhiJ 19:29, 14 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Listing on behalf of User:Beerathon: "This article originally redirected to cat. This is misleading, as domesticus is in no way a species descriptor exclusive Cat (see Passer Domesticus)." Zoz (t) 15:57, 15 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Not used, cross-namespace to an archive page. googl t 16:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Makes no sense. – RHolton ≡– 04:01, 16 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redirect page is completely pointless and left over from an article rename. - Etienne 02:53, 16 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.This is the nickname of a member of that band. Otherwise, this is just an adjective which would be better for someone entering it to get a search result. I couldn't find any better redirect or disambiguation items on Google or WP, and I don't think redirecting or a static disambiguation page for things like "The Teenie Weenies" would be appropriate. Sporty, which was in the same situation, I thought did warrant creating a disambiguation page. — Centrx→ talk • 01:33, 16 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redirect left after article moved from temporary subpage to main page; no edit history here. — C.Fred ( talk) 00:25, 16 July 2006 (UTC) reply
As per discussion, I've nominated American Beauty (film) for deletion. The year is superfluous and there are not other films with the same name, therefore there is no need for this kind of disambiguation. The article it redirects to ( American Beauty (1999 film)) will need to take its place. ---- HughL talk?/ contribs • 23:59, 15 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.I don't believe anyone uses "Iraqo", at least not in any language I know. Jmabel | Talk 19:30, 16 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Plural redirect CMummert 13:41, 17 July 2006 (UTC) reply
See the history of db-blanked. This current redirect is just confusing to use; if the template has been redirected to another (that doesn't fit the name) because it couldn't be made to fit policy, it shouldn't exist at all. When I tried to use this, it placed a db-author message on a page I didn't create, making it look like I was trying to delete a page sneakily; this is sufficient confusion that the redirect should go. (In general, I'm in favour of having lots of db-whatever redirects.) -- ais523 14:51, 17 July 2006 ( U T C)
This was a new article created by someone under the original title "Complete list". I renamed it appropriately, and now the redirect should be removed. EuroSong talk 19:23, 17 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.I moved the entry Col d'ausbique to the correct Col d'Aubisque (please note the spelling typo in the first one!). Pascal.Tesson 20:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC) reply
No reason for it to be here. Probably some sort of vandalism. - Platypus Man | Talk 22:59, 18 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.No reason for it to be here. Probably some sort of vandalism. - Platypus Man | Talk 22:48, 18 July 2006 (UTC) reply
I moved the page because it was in the wrong format for a person's name the redirect is an unlikely search term DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT THE THINGS I MESSED UP 22:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC) reply
I moved the page because it was in the wrong format for a person's name the redirect is an unlikely search term DavidHumphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUT THE THINGS I MESSED UP 22:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Doesn't make much sense since the target is not a guide, but a list. Also, it's very unlikely that anyone would enter the prefix "Wikipedia" if they searched for a cocktail guide. Zoz (t) 18:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The original and target aren't related.
Neologism Pete.Hurd 16:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Apparent neologism. Google search finds mostly tongue-in-cheeck suggestions that (American) football be renamed "tackleball." -- Mwalcoff 23:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC) Mwalcoff 23:38, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross namespace redirect. Could potentially be a disambig page, though, (see [14] and it also appears to be short for Children of the World Cowman109 Talk 17:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross namespace redirect, could potentially be confusing in search terms. Cowman109 Talk 17:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Cross-namespace redirect, and the capitalization seems strange to have page capitalized as well, not to mention the random page button is accessible on every single page in Wikipedia to the left of the screen, making the redirect unnecessary. Cowman109 Talk 17:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply
This is actually a request for a move onto a redirect page. The article once at Waldorf Education has been wrongly moved to Waldorf-education and should now be moved to Waldorf education; this requires a deletion of the existing redirect at the latter page. Hgilbert 13:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.not Wikipedia style and unlikely to be used Shantavira 07:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.N.B. This listing is the result of a Deletion Review Review. This listing is procedural only. Note to closing admin: A signigiant issue raised in DRV was that prior deletion discussions regarding these deletes were closed excessively early, please allow this discussion to run the full time. — xaosflux Talk 03:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply
---
Unnecessary cross-namespace redirects that aren't proper Wikipedia shortcuts -- NORTH talk 01:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Showtime article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 17:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Showtime article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 17:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Showtime article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 17:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Showtime article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 17:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Showtime article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 17:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Showtime article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 17:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Showtime article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 17:16, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Encore TV article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Incorporated into main Starz! article, not enough info to justify a seperate article HeMan5 ( Talk) 16:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
redirect not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 17:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redirect to talk page, unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redirect to talk page, unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redirect to talk page, unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Redirect to talk page, unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.Unused and not neccessary Lcarsdata ( Talk) 15:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Whilst I have no huge objections to redirect to Mansonite, I still consider the term to be non-notable or a neologism (e.g., 548 Google hits). In particular, Mall goth was recently deleted (see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mall_goth). Note that the result was delete, not redirect. Furthermore, all the "mall goth" variation pages (different cases, spacing - e.g., Mall Goth) were then speedy deleted as a result [16]. This redirect has been recreated just 2 days later. I don't see any fundamental difference between "Mall goth" and "Mallgoth" (if anything, I'd say Mallgoth is less common) - so should we stick by the AfD, or recreate all these pages as redirects? Mdwh 10:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
Move of article to "St. Michelle Malkin" and back (too much July 4 spirits?) left this relic. Not a likely search string, no edits other than moves. CWC (talk) 10:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.See also WP:DRV with regards to the similar Jews did WTC. This is an inflammatory redirect and not anything anyone would likely search for. BigDT 01:15, 20 July 2006 (UTC) reply