The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Reef The Lost Cauze.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The claimed Creative Commons license does not apply. Firstly, the claim "All user-contributed text, images and links on this page is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License." is not borne out by the actual licensing statement at the referenced license page [1] which only covers text. Secondly, the license is limited to that page: "All user-contributed text on this page" (emphasis added). The image comes from a different page and not the biography page. Article was nominated for relatively speedy deletion, and then contested by adding a Flickr link. This is simply a case of attempted flickrwashing the license as the name of the flickr account would seem to indicate that the uploader simply created the flickr account to try to fake a CC license. Whpq ( talk) 04:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

I've added a flickr link which says the file is under Creative Commons license. TT ( talk) 15:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Dear TwinTurbo: Perhaps you can address the concerns outlined in the nomination; in particular, your misrepresentation of the license statement. -- Whpq ( talk) 21:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply

• {{ vd}} Looks like a clear case of Flickrwashing. Flickr account created this month and only a small number of images. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 15:52, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Vinnie Paz 2007.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The claimed Creative Commons license does not apply. Firstly, the claim "Clearly states All user-contributed text and images on this page is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License and may also be available under the GNU Free Documentation License." is not borne out by the actual licensing statement at the referenced license page [2] which only covers text. Secondly, the license is limited to that page: "All user-contributed text on this page" (emphasis added). The image comes from a different page and not the biography page. Article was nominated for relatively speedy deletion, and then contested by adding a Flickr link. This is simply a case of attempted flickrwashing the license as the name of the flickr account would seem to indicate that the uploader simply created the flickr account to try to fake a CC license. Whpq ( talk) 04:02, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

I've added a flickr link which says the file is under Creative Commons license. TT ( talk) 15:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Dear TwinTurbo: Perhaps you can address the concerns outlined in the nomination; in particular, your misrepresentation of the license statement. -- Whpq ( talk) 21:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply

• {{ vd}} Looks like a clear case of Flickrwashing. Flickr account created this month and only a small number of images. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 15:53, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use. January ( talk) 12:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Elks of Canada logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo artwork (Canadian) so I don't see how this is PD. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • At the bottom of the official website it says "Please Note: Images are free for you to use, but cannot be altered without permission." Is that not sufficient?-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 19:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
    • No. It can't be modified. See {{ db-f3}}. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 15:43, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply
      • But the image has not been modified. It appears on the page exactly as it appears on their website.-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 18:36, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply
        • The file is not in the public domain as claimed. The Elks of Canada are allowing people to use it without modification. That's different from public domain. I suggest that you look at WP:FAIRUSE, and provide a rationale of the use of the logo at the Elks of Canada page. I don't see this particular image as requiring deletion, but rather correction to appropriate licensing declaration and adhering to our guidelines for non-free content. -- Whpq ( talk) 21:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply
          • Would adding this solve the issue?

{{ Non-free logo}}-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 22:54, 1 March 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep - I have removed the public domain license assertion as it is not the case, and provided an appropriate non-free usage rationale for its use at the Elks of Canada article. -- Whpq ( talk) 21:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC) reply
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC) reply

So is the issue resolved?-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 23:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC) reply

• 'Reply - An administrator will make a decision based on this discussion. -- Whpq ( talk) 02:35, 4 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 12 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:MPUAT Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo artwork ,not necessarily uploaders to re-license. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:46, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept -- TLSuda ( talk) 01:35, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Rev. Sherman Coolidge1.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Whilst this image is claimed as pre 1923 there is no publication date. ( Possibly unfree per Stefan2's logic on other images) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:49, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
• This page identifies 1902 as the year of creation. Year of first publication unknown.

Is De Lancey W. Gill the same person as De Lancey Gill (1859-1940)? -- Stefan2 ( talk) 14:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

This is the Smithsonian's bio of Bureau of American Ethnology photographer De Lancey W. Gill, which states that he died in 1940. January ( talk) 12:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Oliver Hardy.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image is watermarked, I also fail to see how a 1934 image can be own work. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:50, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:07, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Laurel and Hardy.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This looks like a publicity still, so I am querying if this is own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:51, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Let's assume that the "own work" claim is incorrect. Based on their age on the photo, this seems to have been taken at least 70-80 years ago. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 14:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
• I've nuked this and the uploader's remaining images. All are webscraped, doubtful provenance and one even still had the (c) Associated Press exif data. Image may be old enough but we're better off to start from a sourced version - Peripitus (Talk) 05:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept per appropriate license. TLSuda ( talk) 01:24, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Women's Press Club skit.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The LOC entry makes no clear indication that this is public domain. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep, see Commons:Template:PD-Harris-Ewing. (On the LOC entries, "No known restrictions on publication" normally indicates public domain.) January ( talk) 10:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
• "No known restrictions on publication" photo from Library of Congress digital collection. Prairiegrl ( talk) 12:49, 2 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Likeness of Actress Vivien Leigh.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The LOC entry make no clear indication that this is in fact public domain. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep, see Commons:Template:PD-Highsmith. January ( talk) 10:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

On second thoughts, there may be a Commons:COM:FOP issue with this. January ( talk) 10:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

• "No known restrictions on publication" photo from Library of Congress digital collection. Prairiegrl ( talk) 12:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the image's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. January ( talk) 11:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Dietrich Center Walla Walla Community College.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Querying if these needs a seperate license for the architectural work shown. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:31, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  • That one would be {{ PD-US-architecture}}. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 14:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
    • This arena was built in the 1970's when the college was built. My understanding would then be that it is public domain according to the above US Law posted in the link by Stefan2. WWCC Media Blog, includes a quote about the 1977 dedication of the building Squarestate7 ( talk) 06:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Logo of Keas Health with the Keas bird.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo artwork , not necessarily uploaders to relicense. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:07, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Kalash-Balaji-Telefilms-serial.jpeg.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Titlecard for TV , so unsure how this can be CC-BY-SA Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 11:19, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Whova mainmenu.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Software screenshot, not uploaders to re-license. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:00, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Meatspace Chat Screenshot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Software screenshot, No indication it's GPL etc.. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:03, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Whova profiledetail.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Software screenshot, so not necessarily uploaders to re-license Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:08, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Trivium School logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo artwork not uploader's to relicense. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by RHaworth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:10, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Trivium red circle logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo artwork not uploader's to relicense. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Trivium School Logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo artwork not uploader's to relicense. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:16, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: License was appropriately changed to non-free. TLSuda ( talk) 01:25, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:ProductiveMuslimDotCom Homepage.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Web screenshot, which is not necessarily the uploaders to relicense. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 12:17, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply
  How could screenshots be copyrighted? Excuse me for misunderstanding but, under what licence should screenshots be added? -- Omar Othman 95 ( talk) 09:38, 2 March 2014 (UTC) reply
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:The Annexation of Texas to the Union, painting by Donald M. Yena.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The painter seems to be alive, so it is unclear why the uploader thinks that the painting is in the public domain. It is also unclear why User:Sfan00 IMG thinks that the file can be moved to Commons. Stefan2 ( talk) 13:44, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Noted. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:49, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Absolwent (Polish vodka), version for export called "Graduate".jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Packaging artwork, Not neccessarily uploaders to re-license. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

Have I infringed copyright in some magical way? All I did was buy a bottle of vodka, take a photo of it and then upload it here... surely that's not illegal now, is it? If it is, then - for example - why is the other image on the same article (and, for that matter, every single image of a consumer product on Wikipedia) not challenged here? -- Samotny Wędrowiec ( talk) 19:52, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Previous NeXT emulator 0.4, booting NeXTSTEP OS 3.2 Single User.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Software screenshot, Not necessarily uploader's content to relicense? Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Previous NeXT emulator 0.4, with NeXTSTEP OS 2.1 booted.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Software screenshot, Not Necessarily uploaders to re-license Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Webtastic-screenshot.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Non-free screenshot. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Webtastic-2014.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo. Not sure why User:Sfan00 IMG thinks that it can be moved to Commons. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

I thought it might be too simple. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:40, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Medal 1923.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Medal design is not necessarily uploaders to relicense. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Medal 1921.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Medal design is not necessarily the uploaders to re-license Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Bombay Council 1937.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I fail to see how a 1937 item can be own work. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Azim Khan 1920.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Based on the date, I have a hard time considering this as own work. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Azim Khan - 1910.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I have a hard time considering a 1910 item as own work. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Ronhjones ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

File:Palanquin of mahasu devta.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• uploader has other copyright issues, and this is found around the web, including at http://www.jaimahasudeva.in/legend.html which google says is from 5/30/12 but archive.org did not archive before this upload Calliopejen1 ( talk) 16:59, 28 February 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.