From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< September 13 September 15 >

September 14

File:Revjen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept; uploader asserts ownership and there's plenty of pixels. We have to AGF Diannaa ( talk) 22:24, 2 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Revjen.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
  • no proof that this is the uploaders "own work" Redsky89 ( talk) 05:44, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Statquo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Statquo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
  • no proof that this is the uploaders "own work" Redsky89 ( talk) 05:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • The uploader didn’t claim it was their own work, they named someone else as the author. I've added {{ di-no permission}}. January ( talk) 13:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mark Andrew Smith.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept There's no consensus to delete this image. Diannaa ( talk) 15:40, 15 November 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Mark Andrew Smith.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
  • no proof of ownership Redsky89 ( talk) 05:56, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Keep The previous version of this image uploaded by the same person is a different photo of the same person. There is no reason to suppose the uploader did not take both photos. Thincat ( talk) 00:07, 29 October 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Joris Putman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - High resolution image with metadata; uploader asserts it's their own work, and is on a same-name basis with the subject of the photo. We have no reason to doubt him. Diannaa ( talk) 23:22, 30 September 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Joris Putman.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
  • no proof that this is the uploaders "own work" Redsky89 ( talk) 06:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Is there any evidence that it isn't? See uploader response [1]. January ( talk) 14:52, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply
  • Keep, I don't see any reason to be suspicious of this image. Uploader identifies himself on his user page as the subject's father so he would have had access to take the photo. January ( talk) 20:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Matthew Bryden.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Matthew Bryden.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Tagged {{ PD-USGov}} but not sourced to a US Govt website and the source does not indicate that it is a US Govt work. January ( talk) 08:08, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IntelandToshiba.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - both logos are OK Diannaa ( talk) 22:27, 2 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:IntelandToshiba.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Arfa Software Technology Park aerial view.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Arfa Software Technology Park aerial view.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This uploading editor claims that this is their own work. Four of the five uploads by this editor, where they claimed it was their own work, have been proven otherwise and have been deleted under WP:F9. Given the pattern of behaviour by this editor, I am challenging whether this is the editor's own work. I suggest that as per Wikipedia:Copyright violations#Addressing contributors, this file also be deleted due to being a suspected copyright violation. Singularity42 ( talk) 14:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Avitohol.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Avitohol.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Aytos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Aytos.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BabeDorothyRuth.jpg.w300h373.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Absent evidence that the image is now PD, we have to assume it is still under copyright. It was certainly taken after 1923, jusdging by the age of the child. Diannaa ( talk) 15:44, 15 November 2013 (UTC) reply

File:BabeDorothyRuth.jpg.w300h373.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
Keep The original source which is now unfortunately a dead link provided provenance for photo which was supposedly used to vett this photo when it was moved to Commons. As stated, the source is now a dead link, but the photo is available on Spokeo.com, absent the provenance. It seems as though we, editors here on Wikipedia, are continually seeking to delete photos that we previously accepted as public domain, but now no longer accept because the original source that we did accept is now a dead link. Is there another or better way to preserve these sources so that we don't eventually lose all media on Wikipedia? Sf46 ( talk) 16:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply
If you want to keep this, then you need to show that the copyright statements are correct. Without a source confirming that the image was published before 1923 or without renewal, the image can't be kept. The page you linked to contains no information about the provenance of the image and is therefore useless. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 18:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply
The photo is also here on a family website where the User:Sf46 might get a free licence or the provenance. Thincat ( talk) 00:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Badge of Pakistan Armoured Corps.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Badge of Pakistan Armoured Corps.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Berkshire flag.svg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:15, 29 September 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Berkshire flag.svg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Big Top.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Big Top.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Boeing 747-400 Bandara SIM.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Boeing 747-400 Bandara SIM.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Boney james Promo pic.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Boney james Promo pic.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bramley Rotherham.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Bramley Rotherham.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Chart on Human Genome Project.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC) reply

File:Chart on Human Genome Project.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2013_September_14&oldid=1073716430"