The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:MIDSRL.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I was unable to locate the image Google. But the image looks professionally done and has borders. In addition, The size is so small for such a good picture and lacks metadata. Sumanch ( talk) 02:09, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Gajah Gallery's 15th Anniversary Celebration.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image contains quite a lot of 2D art. Are all of those things really de minimis? Note that de minimis laws vary from country to country and I don't know how strict Singapore is, but I find it very unlikely that it would pass as de minimis under the Swedish definition. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Gajah Gallery's 15th Anniversary Celebration (3rd image).jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image contains quite a lot of 2D art. Are all of those things really de minimis? Note that de minimis laws vary from country to country and I don't know how strict Singapore is, but I find it very unlikely that it would pass as de minimis under the Swedish definition. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Ritesh Deshmukh New.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• It looks like the image was cropped from something. The size is small and lacks metadata. Sumanch ( talk) 02:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Gajah Gallery's 15th Anniversary Celebration (2nd image).jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This image contains quite a lot of 2D art. Are all of those things really de minimis? Note that de minimis laws vary from country to country and I don't know how strict Singapore is, but I find it very unlikely that it would pass as de minimis under the Swedish definition. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:B V Kale 1.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks like a clipping from a news article. I don't believe that the user's edits are consistent with that of a photo journalist's. Sumanch ( talk) 02:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Haab's Exterior Sign.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• 2D Poster is substantial part of image  Ronhjones   ^(Talk) 02:27, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
  • This sign carries the logos of the Motor Cities National Heritage Area and the National Park Service. It seems possible that this is a US federal government work that's ineligible for copyright protection. (If so, the licensing should be corrected to reflect that.) cmadler ( talk) 09:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
  • This photo has been flagged for deletion under the misapprehension that it is of a poster. It is not. It is a photo of an historical marker. Wikimedia and Wikipedia are replete with photos of historical markers that have not been flagged. There is an article 'Historical Marker' with several photos of historical markers that have not been flagged. I don't see that any change in the permission is needed. Dwight Burdette ( talk) 11:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
    • Both posters and historical markers are copyrighted, so it is irrelevant to know whether it is a poster or a historical marker. However, if it was produced by the US government, the poster/marker is in the public domain, allowing photos of it. The article Historical marker mainly seems to have pre-1978 markers (i.e. published markers) without copyright signs which are in the public domain. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 22:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
• Keep The National Park Service is a US government agency and Motor Cities National Heritage Area appears to be a part of the park service. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 22:19, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
• I contacted motorcities.org about the marker and this was the response I received:

Hello Dwight,

Thank you very much for contributing to Wikipedia and for contacting me. After speaking to our community liaison, I was informed that the photo should be fine to keep on the Haab’s wikipage. For pieces like this wayside sign, many of the images come from different sources, but this one in particular all the images come from Haab’s directly, so it should not be an issue. Thank you for making me aware of this situation. If you need me to add this to the talk page, let me know!

Thanks! Melissa Hill Administrator MotorCities National Heritage Area 200 Renaissance Center Suite 3148 Detroit, MI 48243 p: 313-259-3425 x306 f: 313-259-5254 Dwight Burdette ( talk) 17:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC) reply

• I spoke with Mike Kabat, the owner of Haab's. He had given me permission to photograph the restaurant when I wrote the Wikipedia article in which this photo appears. He confirmed that he had no objection to the publishing of the photo of the historical marker. Both potential copyright claimants have now responded disclaiming any copyright. The removal of this image would therefore be a arbitrary removal of an non-copyrighted photo. Dwight Burdette ( talk) 19:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Zamboanga City Collage.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• A collage without any sources for the images in it. Stefan2 ( talk) 02:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Vaijnath Shinde.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This user has a history of loading non-free material. I found [ these images] in Google. Can't tell what came first. Sumanch ( talk) 03:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Jacque Fresco on Larry King.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I might be wrong, but it looks like a TV programme. Stefan2 ( talk) 03:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Latur Distict.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• As explained above. It does not appear that the user Jazzradio has created these images. Sumanch ( talk) 03:14, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Latur District 25th Year Anniversary.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• It appears to be an image from news media. Sumanch ( talk) 03:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Vivekanand Hospital and Research Centre.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• It appears that this is another image uploaded by User:Jazzradio. The image quality is inconsistent with the original file created using a camera. Sumanch ( talk) 03:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:LMT Bus.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is a poor quality image uploaded by User:Jazzradio. The bus appears to have been prepared for a professional photo op. But I don't believe originals are in possession of Jazzradio. Sumanch ( talk) 03:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Latur Municipal Building.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Another image by User:Jazzradio. Sumanch ( talk) 03:35, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Goldcrest Latur.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Another file by User:Jazzradio. Sumanch ( talk) 03:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:SVMCRlogo.PNG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this really {{ PD-textlogo}} or is the thing above the text "St. Vincent's" too complex? Stefan2 ( talk) 15:48, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Makes no difference to me. I've included a fair use rationale. Mgrē@sŏn 13:12, 8 February 2012 (UTC) reply

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Alf Wood - Oldham.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Something wrong with the copyright tags: it is both listed as free and as unfree at the same time. It says that the picture was taken "circa 1922" and if it was published before 1923 it is free in the United States at least. Stefan2 ( talk) 15:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Satish.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Military people: See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Satish.jpg. Portrait of a man: uploaded without changing the file information page, so the licence and source are unknown. The sole purpose of the image appears to use it in an article proposed for speedy deletion (see Satish chandra kumar) so the image should probably also be deleted. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Romanian compilations.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I tagged this as "no permission" but the uploader removed the tag, claiming own work. If the uploader really produced the CD covers, this needs to be recorded in OTRS. If someone else produced the CD covers, this is an unfree derivative work. Stefan2 ( talk) 16:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
  • As far as the photograph was taken by me in my own house, showing musical albums that I bough myself, I can't see the reason for deleting it. If it comes from Mariah Carey's album cover, I may crop, cut or blur it. Just tell me what to do in order to keep the file. Innano1 ^(talk) 4:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC+2)
    • The CD covers are copyrighted. You would have to delete all of them from the image. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 18:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; file is tagged as non-free.- FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:37, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Indianstatisticalinstitutelogo.svg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I tagged this as "no source" and "no licence", but the uploader deleted the tag. He later made this revision of the file which suggests that the logo only is for non-commercial use. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Circuit diagram for an intelligent bell.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I tagged as {{ di-no source no license}}. The uploader replaced the image with the text "source:there is no copyright issues for this picture" without proving that this is the case. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:18, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Yisrael Mordecai Safeek.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low resolution. No EXIF. Lots of copyright statements on the uploader's talk page (with a "last warning" by User:Ronhjones). Could easily be a reupload of one of the deleted images. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Safeek08-24-09.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Low resolution. No EXIF. Lots of copyright statements on the uploader's talk page (with a "last warning" by User:Ronhjones). Could easily be a reupload of one of the deleted images. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:BobT6.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Video game character, unlikely to be free. Also at wikia:tekken:File:BobT6.jpg which also lacks copyright information. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Marcus-Dillistone-Icehotel-2010.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• {{ Self}} and {{ information}} seem to disagree about the author. It might be a reupload of one or more of the images mentioned on the uploader's talk page, so this could maybe be speedied. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Marcus-Dillistone-Icehotel.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• See #File:Marcus-Dillistone-Icehotel-2010.jpg above. This is a dupe and we only need one of them anyway. Stefan2 ( talk) 22:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Karel2.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be unfree software (see the word "copyright" at the bottom of the mentioned web site), but the web site remains in Czech even if I click on the US flag, so I can't read the text. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:04, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
• Please open Terms of Use, there is the following Image Policy: "Anyone can take screenshots from the front page slider as well as from inside of NCLab and all its graphical applications, and use them in any way, as long as the source (NCLab) is mentioned." — Preceding unsigned comment added by PavelSolin ( talk • contribs) 21:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC) reply
• When I previously tried looking at the web site, it was only available in Czech (and clicking on any of the flags didn't help: it remained in Czech), so the page was unreadable for me and it was thus impossible to find any terms of use. Now I see that the page has changed so that it is available in English, and so it is possible to find and read the terms of use. The text "Image policy: Anyone can take screenshots from the front page slider as well as from inside of NCLab and all its graphical applications, and use them in any way, as long as the source (NCLab) is mentioned." sounds enough to me. The currently listed licence is wrong, of course. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 10:36, 9 February 2012 (UTC) reply
• I have fixed the licensing information for this file. -- Chris (talk) 20:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Litrato3389.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of CDs. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:12, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Goku V. Superman.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Looks as a combination of unfree, orphaned and useless. Stefan2 ( talk) 23:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC) reply

File:Breeklogoo.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Derivative work of something. Is the subject of the photo really free? Stefan2 ( talk) 23:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC) reply
• Scanning through the uploaders contributions, I've also found File:Breeks,James Wilkinson's Picture at Breeks.jpg. I'm guessing that these are some sort of sculpture (don't know the right term -- possibly frieze?) from Breeks Memorial School. Since the school moved to its current location in 1886 (uncited in the article but no reason not to believe it), it's possible that the original works might be PD. cmadler ( talk) 14:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.