The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Ilaiyaraaja BH.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: the image source [1] does not support the licence added by the uploader and the watermark appears to indicate copyright ownership by the source website ww2censor ( talk) 03:13, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

• That image was originally taken from www.bollywoodhungama.com. According to the site, "Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify these images, providing the site is attributed and a direct link running to the source on their site is provided". Should I upload it in "Commons" instead please let me know. Thanks!-- Thalapathi (Ping Back) 09:54, 4 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Where did you get that statement from because I could not find any such statement and the images are apparently uploaded by uses who may not be aware of the copyright of the image. We need something better. That usage statement is not quite clear enough for us to use. Uploading to the commons will not fix the problem with the licence. ww2censor ( talk) 18:42, 4 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Brina Palencia.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: image source is no good but the identical, but higher resolution, image is found at imbd http://www.imdb.com/media/rm1118471936/nm1754270 clearly attributed to Leslie Katz – © 2010. The alleged permission link is also useless. ww2censor ( talk) 03:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:FridayNightSmackdown logo .jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo, no source, unlikely uploader is (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk) 04:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:WWF IC Title.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• given the artefacts, appears to be photoshopped from another source, not provided; without underlying source, not possible to determine actual (c) status

Also incuding File:WWE Undisputed Championship.jpg, File:Wwf winge egale.jpg, File:WWE 80s Championshionship.jpg, for same reason. Skier Dude ( talk) 04:09, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

• Speedy Delete all as copyright infringement. It's a bad cut and paste job from somewhere else for sure. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:29, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Pictures-of-knights-2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image says "it was a drawing by an r.k.a member who i got permission from" but the image is a professional quality illustration, so the standards are higher, there should be an OTRS. That being said, I'm not even sure if that statement is correct, it was added after a 26 May 2008 message to the uploader asking about the copyright status of the image. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:34, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Socom16 (2).JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• No copyright information FOR THE NEW UPLOAD. The original upload had copyright information; requesting deletion of newer revision, but I don't think there is a tag for that specifically. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 16:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply
• Actually, the old revision is already at File:Socom16.JPG, so this whole file could probably be deleted. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 16:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Moonjellymma.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Licensing tag claims "self" as source, but I highly doubt this is user-created based on the nature of the image and lack of additional information. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 16:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:AtlanticSeaNettle.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Licensing tag claims "self" as source, but I highly doubt this is user-created based on the nature of the image and lack of additional information. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 16:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Hamlet Isaxanli.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Image caption (which was added to the article by the uploader) is " Khazar University Media Archives". I'm thinking that this image is from said archives, and not user-created as the tag states. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 16:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Animusworldfusionensemblepic.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Even if the uploader is who they say they are (Animusmusic), we need evidence of permission... and then, is this copyrighted by the photographer? The band? The label? There just isn't enough information. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 18:24, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:08, 17 June 2011 (UTC) reply

File:Marilyns Pennines.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The map was created on Microsoft Autoroute, so was probably derived from an existing non-free map in the software Peter E. James ( talk) 20:28, 3 June 2011 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.