The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Yhn 111.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Album cover tagged as self-created; no evidence that the uploader is actually the creator. — Bkell ( talk) 02:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Vernes Selimović.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• reason Guitarist0407 ( talk) 16:37, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Mate Dragičević.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• reason Guitarist0407 ( talk) 16:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC) reply

File:MarsGlacier.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• As a policy, ESA does not release their works under a free license, except in very specific cases (and even then, I don't know when they'd release into public domain). Existing source link does not go anywhere, thus the license status cannot be confirmed. — Huntster ( t @ c) 19:33, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply

I looked into the copyright issues a little, and I believe the images that ESA does not release to the public are its promotional images in the ESA multimedia gallery. ESA does release the raw data to the scientific community at large (and the public), and you are free to use those images as long as you process them yourself. I believe this is the case, although, I must admit, ESA's website is less than perfectly clear. I wrote to them a while ago to let them know that I have posted the image on Wikipedia, and they did not respond to ask me to take it down. I think it would be very odd for ESA to devote a large website like the Planetary Science Archive (where I downloaded this image) to distributing these images to the public if they were not free to use. Rppeabody ( talk) 23:03, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply

In case anyone is unclear about how I downloaded the data from the link I provided, I'm giving instructions: Go to [1] and click on where it says "Map-based Search" about two inches down from the top of the page in the center. This will load the map-based browsing tool that I used to download this image. After you download the images, you will need special software to open and process them. Rppeabody ( talk) 16:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC) reply

ESA makes a vast number of images available for public consumption, but the license still stays with ESA. I'm sorry if I'm missing something, but the simple release of data into the public domain is not the same as licensing it as Public Domain (or any other free license), unless such a license is specifically stated. Can you specifically point to a page that says these data sets and/or files are freely licensed, rather than just made available for public consumption? — Huntster ( t @ c) 10:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:28, 12 November 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Alexbandlive2010.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• This is cropped from an original found at http://www.alexmaxband.de/gallery/displayimage.php?album=134&pos=14 - there is no evidence that User:LostLikeTearsInRain is the photographer and previous deletion discussions ( example 1, example 2, etc.) show that the user uploaded work by others as "own work". Hekerui ( talk) 22:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.