The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Keep; OTRS Ticket (4632948) received and confirmed.  Chzz   ►  07:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Jadestarr.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Suspected non-free image; no explanation of source or licence  Chzz   ►  00:06, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

It is a free image. I took it myself. The source would be my camera I suppose. Thanks! Phantomcowboy ( talk) 00:12, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Withdrawn by nominator - OTRS received.  Chzz   ►  07:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:WinningFT Homepage.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: non-free orphaned screenshot dependent on deleted page. ww2censor ( talk) 03:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:WinningFT Logo.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: non-free orphaned logo dependent on deleted page. ww2censor ( talk) 03:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Wftscreenshot.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: orphaned non-free screenshot claimed to be work of uploader. ww2censor ( talk) 03:40, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:WinningFT.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: orphaned non-free logo claimed to be work of uploader. ww2censor ( talk) 03:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Sellars2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: non-free image whose source [1] shows a creative commons non-commercial non-derivative licence. ww2censor ( talk) 04:24, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Hayden allenpic.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Delete: source page [2] shows attribution to http://www.imagesportnz.com/ news agency. ww2censor ( talk) 04:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Colestowerbowdoin.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Black and white photo - apparently a promotional image of some sort. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:19, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Farooque Shaikh.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:HermanArkansas.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Historical Photo. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Avraham Tal.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Studio style photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Doctor Partap Chauhan.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

• Hi, this photograph is my own copyright. It might have been used online by other sources. Kindly suggest what I can do to continue using it on Wikipedia. Thank You.

JivaGroup ( talk) 07:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Please see WP:DCM, as applicable. - FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Educator Steve Rudolph.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional photo of a notable individual. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

• Hi, this photograph is my own copyright. It might have been used online by other sources. Kindly suggest what I can do to continue using it on Wikipedia. Thank You.

JivaGroup ( talk) 07:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Please see WP:DCM, as applicable. - FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Alexf ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Simonmannering.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Professional style sports photo. Likely copyrighted, judging by the provided source. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply
• Delete: source clearly show this to be a copyright Getty Images photo. ww2censor ( talk) 13:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:49, 3 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:The Man Who Invented Las Vegas Book Cover.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Book Cover. Likely copyrighted. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by MuZemike ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Andy-Powell-001.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sports photo. Likely copyrighted, judging by provided source. No reason given to suggest that uploader is copyright holder. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 07:47, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply
• Delete: this Daily Telegraph article clearly shows it to be a Getty Images photo. ww2censor ( talk) 13:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:MexicanHeritagePlazaMural.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Freedom of panorama US does not extend to art, its non-free IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 14:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Licensed as non-free. — ξ ^xplicit 19:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Mods.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• possible image vandalism IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 14:25, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Keep image is a non-free album cover in need of a fair-use rationale. A better quality original image still exists as File:BClowercampusfall.jpg. ww2censor ( talk) 16:58, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

change the description and licensing information and add a FUR or uploaded it under a diferante name, i dont care witch one you pick but as it is now it falls under CSD F9 copyvio.-- IngerAlHaosului ( talk) 15:23, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:48, 26 March 2010 (UTC) reply

File:John Huyette Reverse Mohawk.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• uploaded without consent, uploader does not own image 128.190.174.91 ( talk) 17:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Patrick kennedy.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• source not specified beyond house.gov, search of website doesn't give the image Hekerui ( talk) 19:13, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept. CXC is Nasa's observatory, M.Muno the operator who works for UCLA. This credit for the discovery is not copyright. Shell ^babelfish 09:23, 7 April 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Westerlund1 optical xray.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• The image is credited to NASA/CXC/UCLA/M.Muno et al., not just NASA, at http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2005/wd1/ Hekerui ( talk) 21:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.